PM issued notice on damages suit by Shahbaz

Published June 6, 2020
Shahbaz had filed the suit in 2017 when Khan, in a press conference, had stated that the plaintiff had offered him Rs10bn through a common friend in exchange of withdrawing the Panama Papers case. — AFP/File
Shahbaz had filed the suit in 2017 when Khan, in a press conference, had stated that the plaintiff had offered him Rs10bn through a common friend in exchange of withdrawing the Panama Papers case. — AFP/File

LAHORE: A court on Friday issued a notice to Prime Minster Imran Khan on an application by Leader of Opposition in National Assembly Shahbaz Sharif for early hearing of his Rs10bn suit for damages under Defamation Ordinance, 2002.

Shahbaz had filed the suit in 2017 when Khan, in a press conference, had stated that the plaintiff had offered him Rs10bn through a common friend in exchange of withdrawing the Panama Papers case before the Supreme Court.

The application for early hearing, filed through Advocate Mustafa Ramday, said the defendant had failed to file a written statement for the last three years, causing no substantial proceedings in the case.

It stated the total number of hearings conducted by the court was 60 and out of which on 30 different occasions, the counsel, on behalf of the defendant (Khan), had sought adjournment while on last hearing, a vice-counsel for the defendant told the court that the lead counsel, Babar Awan, was unable to travel from Islamabad to Lahore due to coronavirus pandemic and the court adjourned the hearing for June 22.

It said Awan, under the law, could not appear before the court to defend the defendant since had had become adviser to Prime Minister Imran Khan.

The application asked the court to impose a fine on the vice-counsel for making a false statement and fix the case for an early hearing.

Additional District & Sessions Judge Sohail Anjum issued notice to the defendant on the application for June 10.

The damages suit states the plaintiff had served a legal notice to the defendant, asking him to tender a proper apology within 14 days through the print and electronic media. However, the defendant failed to make an apology and the plaintiff was left with no option but to approach the court for recovery of damages.

The suit pleads that the baseless and defamatory statements by the defendant widely circulated by the media lowered the integrity of the plaintiff and caused him extreme mental torture, agony and anxiety.

The court has been requested to issue a decree for recovery of Rs10bn as compensation for the publication of defamatory content in favour of the plaintiff.

Published in Dawn, June 6th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Confused state
Updated 05 Jan, 2025

Confused state

WHEN it comes to combatting violent terrorism, the state’s efforts seem to be suffering from a lack of focus. The...
Born into hunger
05 Jan, 2025

Born into hunger

OVER 18.2 million children — 35 every minute — were born into hunger in 2024, with Pakistan accounting for 1.4m...
Tourism triumph
05 Jan, 2025

Tourism triumph

THE inclusion of Gilgit-Baltistan in CNN’s list of top 25 destinations to visit in 2025 is a proud moment for...
Falling temperatures
Updated 04 Jan, 2025

Falling temperatures

Vitally important for stakeholders to acknowledge, understand politicians can still challenge opposing parties’ narratives without also being in a constant state of war with each other.
Agriculture census
04 Jan, 2025

Agriculture census

ACCURATE information relating to agricultural activities is vital for data-driven future planning, policymaking, as...
Biometrics for kids
04 Jan, 2025

Biometrics for kids

ALTHOUGH the move has caused a panic among weary parents mortified at the thought of carting their children to Nadra...