Israel must face consequences over planned West Bank annexations, says Palestinian PM

Published June 9, 2020
Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh addresses journalists during a meeting with members of the Foreign Press Association in Ramallah, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, June 9. — Reuters
Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh addresses journalists during a meeting with members of the Foreign Press Association in Ramallah, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, June 9. — Reuters

Israel must face consequences if it annexes land in the occupied West Bank, Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh said on Tuesday, pointing to possible European sanctions.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has pledged to extend Israeli sovereignty to Jewish settlements and the Jordan Valley in the West Bank, territory Israel took in the 1967 Middle East war and which Palestinians seek for a state.

Netanyahu’s new government is due to begin discussing the de facto annexation on July 1, but it is unclear whether Israel’s main ally, the United States, would greenlight the step.

The Palestinians have rejected US President Donald Trump’s peace blueprint, announced in January, under which most of the settlements Israel built would be incorporated into “contiguous Israeli territory”.

At a news conference, Shtayyeh said annexation would kill any possibility of peace with Israel and erode “the Palestinian, regional and international consensus” on a two-state solution.

He said Israel must now “feel the heat of international pressure”.

European states, Shtayyeh said, were debating “sanctions on Israel and freezing association agreements, as well as cancelling some research programmes” and “recognising Palestine” as a state in the West Bank and Gaza.

Most countries view Israel’s settlements on occupied land as illegal. Israel disputes this. Palestinians now exercise limited self-rule in parts of the West Bank while Palestinian Islamist group Hamas rules tiny Gaza.

But Shtayyeh said the 27-nation European Union’s consensus decision-making was “a bit complicated”, and one or two countries were not in line with others on the issue.

An EU spokesman in Jerusalem declined comment on Shtayyeh’s remarks but pointed to an earlier statement from EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell which said that annexation, “if implemented, could not pass unchallenged”.

Without giving details, Shtayyeh said that the Palestinians have submitted a counter-proposal to Trump’s plan to the Quartet of Middle East mediators — the US, Russia, the EU and United Nations.

The Palestinians have declared agreements with Israel void in protest against annexation.

Shtayyeh said his government’s rejection of taxes collected by Israel on its behalf meant salaries would not be paid to some 130,000 public workers.

Israelis protest annexation plan

Meanwhile, several thousand Israelis have demonstrated against Netanyahu’s plan to annex Israeli-occupied West Bank.

Protesting in face masks and keeping their distance from each other under coronavirus restrictions, they gathered on Saturday under the banner “No to annexation, no to occupation, yes to peace and democracy”.

Demonstrators protest under coronavirus restrictions against Israeli plan to annex parts of occupied West Bank, Tel Aviv, Israel. — Reuters
Demonstrators protest under coronavirus restrictions against Israeli plan to annex parts of occupied West Bank, Tel Aviv, Israel. — Reuters

Some waved Palestinian flags.

The protest was organised by left-wing groups and did not appear to be the start of a popular mass movement.

Around half of Israelis support annexation, according to a recent opinion poll.

The organisers screened a video address by US Senator Bernie Sanders.

“It has never been more important to stand up for justice, and to fight for the future we all deserve,” Sanders said.

“It’s up to all of us to stand up to authoritarian leaders and to build a peaceful future for every Palestinian and every Israeli," the Vermont senator added.

Opinion

Editorial

A new direction
Updated 18 Mar, 2025

A new direction

While kinetic response may temporarily disable violent actors, it will not address underlying factors providing ideological fuel to insurgencies.
BTK settlement
18 Mar, 2025

BTK settlement

WHEREVER the money goes, controversy follows. The PMLN-led federal government, which recently announced that it will...
Sugar crisis
18 Mar, 2025

Sugar crisis

GREED knows no bounds. But the avarice of those involved in the sugar business — from manufacturers to retailers...
NAP revival
Updated 17 Mar, 2025

NAP revival

This bloody cycle of violence will continue unless action is complemented with social, economic, political efforts in Balochistan and KP.
New reality
17 Mar, 2025

New reality

THE US retreat from global climate finance commitments could not have come at a worse time. Pakistan faces an...
Killer traffic
17 Mar, 2025

Killer traffic

MYSTERIOUS and unstoppable. It is these words that perhaps best describe the recent surge in traffic-related...