Malik’s plea for recovery of damages from Cynthia admitted for hearing

Published June 30, 2020
US blogger Cynthia D. Ritchie stopped from posting defamatory material against Rehman Malik on social media. — Dawn.com/File
US blogger Cynthia D. Ritchie stopped from posting defamatory material against Rehman Malik on social media. — Dawn.com/File

ISLAMABAD: An additional district and sessions judge (ADSJ) on Monday admitted for hearing the legal suit filed by former interior minister Rehman Malik for the recovery of Rs50 billion damages from US blogger Cynthia D. Ritchie for defamation.

ADSJ Atta Rabbani stopped Ms Ritchie from posting defamatory material against Mr Malik on social media and summoned her in person on July 13.

Ms Ritchie and Mr Malik are at loggerheads since the former accused the latter of raping her in 2011. She also alleged that Mr Malik had tried to harass her. Last week, after attending the proceedings in the Islamabad High Court, the blogger had claimed that Mr Malik had told her “horrific stories” about the late prime minister Benazir Bhutto. However, Mr Malik promptly denied this claim.

It may be mentioned that a local court of Islamabad has already issued a directive for the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) to proceed against Ms Ritchie for posting defamatory material against Ms Bhutto on her social media accounts.

Mr Malik had earlier served Ms Ritchie a legal notice, stating that due to the “false, frivolous and baseless allegation” his reputation had “adversely suffered at the national and international level”. He said he had a right to “redeem his position” after Ms Ritchie’s TV appearances.

Mr Malik, through the notice, has demanded Ms Ritchie pay him Rs50 billion in damages, a “prompt” withdrawal of the allegations “in the same manner in which [they were] released and posted on social, print and electronic media” within 15 days of receiving the notice, as well as an “unqualified apology”.

The court after initial hearing on Monday asked Mr Malik to deposit the process fee of the court within two days.

“Summons be issued to the defendant for July 13, 2020 in lieu of UMS….Till next date of hearing the defendant is restrained from publishing any defamatory material against the plaintiff,” it ordered.

Published in Dawn, June 30th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Economic plan
Updated 02 Jan, 2025

Economic plan

Absence of policy reforms allows the bureaucracy a lot of space to wriggle out of responsibility.
On life support
02 Jan, 2025

On life support

PAKISTAN stands at a precarious crossroads as we embark on a new year. Pildat’s Quality of Democracy report has...
Harsh sentence
02 Jan, 2025

Harsh sentence

USING lawfare to swiftly get rid of political opponents makes a mockery of the legal system, especially when ...
Looking ahead
Updated 01 Jan, 2025

Looking ahead

The dawn of 2025 brings with it hope of a more constructive path to much-needed stability.
On the front lines
Updated 01 Jan, 2025

On the front lines

THE human cost of terrorism in 2024 was staggering. The ISPR reports 383 officers and soldiers embraced martyrdom...
Avoiding reform
01 Jan, 2025

Avoiding reform

PAKISTAN’S economic growth significantly slowed down to a modest 0.92pc during the first quarter of the present...