ISLAMABAD: A group of clerics on Wednesday opposed the construction of a Hindu temple and one ally of the PML-N even accused former prime minister Nawaz Sharif for going against Sharia by allotting land for a temple in the capital.

The clerics, who are from seminaries of the Deobandi and Ahle Hadith schools of thought, held a press conference at the National Press Club where they warned the government not to allow the construction of a temple in the city.

Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl Emir Maulana Abdul Majeed Hazaravi said they would “not allow the construction of temples in Islamabad” and that the government should refrain from building a temple in the city “otherwise there will be a severe reaction”.

He also claimed that building a temple violated the teachings of Islam and the ideology of the country.

“This government does not know what it wants to do with the ideology of the state - open the corridor for Sikhs by investing Rs14 billion, now a temple in Islamabad,” Mr Hazaravi said.

He said they would take the matter to the Federal Shariat Court and added that the government should have asked senior clerics or the Council of Islamic Ideology before making a decision in this regard.

Markazi Jamiat Ahle Hadith Islamabad Emir Hafiz Maqsood Ahmed criticised the previous PML-N government for allotting land for the temple in 2017, and the current PTI government for releasing funds for its construction. He claimed that the ideology of Pakistan was being violated.

When the clerics were asked if the former prime minister’s decision to allot land for the temple were wrong, Mr Maqsood claimed it was against Sharia.

Reporters at the presser pointed out that both the JUI-F and the Markazi Jamiat Ahle Hadith were allied with the PML-N government, and the leader of the Markazi Jamiat Ahle Hadith Senator Sajid Mir was elected to the upper house on a PML-N ticket.

Mr Maqsood then said that Islam does not deny religious minorities rights, but then criticised the government for building a temple using tax money for Muslims and said this was “illegal in light of decrees by various scholars”.

Jamaat-i-Islami Islamabad Deputy Emir Kashif Chaudhry said that the capital’s Hindu population should be given the existing temple in Saidpur village for worship. He criticised the government for spending money on gurdwaras and temples instead of mosques and seminaries.

When the JI leader was asked whether there were similarities between their demand and the policies of the right-wing Modi government in India, the clerics said they were against the destruction of old places of worship belonging to non-Muslims, saying these should be renovated and handed over to those communities.

Mufti Abdul Salam from Jamia Muhammadia in F-6 said that the Hindu community should build the temple at their own expense with the government’s permission, saying this is how Muslims fund the construction of mosques in the West.

Published in Dawn, July 2nd, 2020

Opinion

From hard to harder

From hard to harder

Instead of ‘hard state’ turning even harder, citizens deserve a state that goes soft on them in delivering democratic and development aspirations.

Editorial

Canal unrest
Updated 03 Apr, 2025

Canal unrest

With rising water scarcity in Indus system, it is crucial to move towards a consensus-driven policymaking process.
Iran-US tension
03 Apr, 2025

Iran-US tension

THE Trump administration’s threats aimed at Iran do not bode well for global peace, and unless Washington changes...
Flights to history
03 Apr, 2025

Flights to history

MOHENJODARO could have been the forgotten gold we desperately need. Instead, this 5,000-year-old well of antiquity ...
Eid amidst crises
Updated 31 Mar, 2025

Eid amidst crises

Until the Muslim world takes practical steps to end these atrocities, these besieged populations will see no joy.
Women’s rights
Updated 01 Apr, 2025

Women’s rights

Such judgements, and others directly impacting women’s rights should be given more airtime in media.
Not helping
Updated 02 Apr, 2025

Not helping

If it's committed to peace in Balochistan, the state must draw a line between militancy and legitimate protest.