‘PML-Q prevented use of force against Fazl’s sit-in’

Published July 11, 2020
JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman had claimed that he had ended his three-week Islamabad sit-in on the assurance that PM Khan would immediately step down. — Reuters/File
JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman had claimed that he had ended his three-week Islamabad sit-in on the assurance that PM Khan would immediately step down. — Reuters/File

LAHORE: Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid chief Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain on Friday disclosed that some elements in the Imran Khan government wanted to use force against the JUI-F’s October last sit-in in Islamabad to disperse the protesters but his party counseled the premier over the repercussions of the step.

“Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi told PM Khan that in case of use of force there could be casualties, advising him that no one in his government would be ready to own this and eventually he (premier) would be held responsible for this,” Chaudhry Shujaat said in a statement issued here on Friday.

Without naming who were in favour of using the force against the sit-in holders, the PML-Q head said: “Some people (in the government) were in favour of using force to end Maualan Fazlur Rehman’s dharna (sit-in). No one was ready to talk to Imran Khan to tell him about the adverse consequences of this step.

(Punjab Assembly Speaker) Pervaiz Elahi, who was not a formal member of the government negotiating team, counseled Imran Khan that if bloodshed started, nobody would be ready to take the responsibility and he (Khan) would be answerable for this. On this, PM Khan deferred the decision to use force... and subsequently, the Maulana ended the sit-in through a peaceful dialogue with us,” he said.

A source in the PTI told Dawn that PM Khan had made up his mind to use the force against the protesters who camped in the capital for his resignation after consulting the ‘hawkish’ group in the party. “Imran Khan was upset over the language used in the sit-in about him and the Maulana was also prolonging the protest in violation of his early commitment.”

However, he said, Mr Elahi managed to persuade the premier to handle the matter through dialogue.

“The Chaudhrys had in the past advised former president Gen Musharraf not to use force in the Lal Masjid case but he declined and subsequently he had to pay the price for what happened there,” he said.

JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman had claimed that he had ended his three-week Islamabad sit-in on the assurance that PM Khan would immediately step down and new elections would be held three months after his resignation.

Recently, the Maulana had asked Pervaiz Elahi to disclose the secret he was carrying as ‘amanat’ for ending the sit-in. It is said that Maulana Fazl had ended the sit-in after ‘some assurance’ from the powers that be.

Talking on assurances to Maulana Fazl, Chaudhry Shujaat said: “The clash between police and protesters seemed imminent. But Maulana’s far-farsightedness and our belief to resolve the matter through dialogue helped avert the clash.”

Published in Dawn, July 11th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Strange claim
Updated 21 Dec, 2024

Strange claim

In all likelihood, Pakistan and US will continue to be ‘frenemies'.
Media strangulation
Updated 21 Dec, 2024

Media strangulation

Administration must decide whether it wishes to be remembered as an enabler or an executioner of press freedom.
Israeli rampage
21 Dec, 2024

Israeli rampage

ALONG with the genocide in Gaza, Israel has embarked on a regional rampage, attacking Arab and Muslim states with...
Tax amendments
Updated 20 Dec, 2024

Tax amendments

Bureaucracy gimmicks have not produced results, will not do so in the future.
Cricket breakthrough
20 Dec, 2024

Cricket breakthrough

IT had been made clear to Pakistan that a Champions Trophy without India was not even a distant possibility, even if...
Troubled waters
20 Dec, 2024

Troubled waters

LURCHING from one crisis to the next, the Pakistani state has been consistent in failing its vulnerable citizens....