Court restrains CAA from taking action against pilot

Published July 30, 2020
The CAA had revoked the Airline Transport Licence of petitioner Syed Saqlain Akhtar, calling it dubious. — AFP/File
The CAA had revoked the Airline Transport Licence of petitioner Syed Saqlain Akhtar, calling it dubious. — AFP/File

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Wednesday stopped the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) from proceeding against a pilot whose licence was recently revoked by the authority for being ‘dubious’.

The CAA had revoked the Airline Transport Licence of petitioner Syed Saqlain Akhtar, calling it dubious.

“The federal government is directed to submit written comments within 10 days,” the court order said.

After preliminary arguments, the court also sought explanation from the federal government as to “why the post of the director general of Civil Aviation Authority has not been filled on a permanent basis for the last two years”.

Saqlain Akhtar’s licence was revoked for being ‘dubious’

IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah noted that the post of the director general was one of the most important positions and giving additional charge of it to the secretary of CAA or any other person did not appear to be in consonance with the principles of good governance.

The counsel for the petitioner contended that the post of the CAA’s director general had not been filled on a permanent basis for the last two years.

The counsel referred to para 3 of the impugned order, dated July 14, 2020, relating to revoking Mr Akhtar’s licence which was supposed to be dealt with by the director general of CAA, but as there was no permanent DG of CAA, the matter had to be disposed of by the secretary of Aviation Division.

The counsel further contended that the petitioner was never confronted with any material relating to the alleged use of unfair means to clear the Airline Transport Pilot Licence (ATPL) theoretical knowledge examination.

The lawyer argued that the posts of secretary of the Aviation Division and CAA’s director general had been held by the same person and, therefore, the impugned order, dated July 14, was not sustainable.

He said the order had been passed in haste and that too in violation of the principles of procedural fairness.

The court issued notices to the secretary of Aviation, CAA and the federal government and adjourned the hearing till Aug 12.

The court ordered the respondents that authorities be “restrained from initiating criminal proceedings against the petitioner till the date fixed”.

Published in Dawn, July 30th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...
Strange claim
Updated 21 Dec, 2024

Strange claim

In all likelihood, Pakistan and US will continue to be ‘frenemies'.
Media strangulation
Updated 21 Dec, 2024

Media strangulation

Administration must decide whether it wishes to be remembered as an enabler or an executioner of press freedom.
Israeli rampage
21 Dec, 2024

Israeli rampage

ALONG with the genocide in Gaza, Israel has embarked on a regional rampage, attacking Arab and Muslim states with...