Concern over sedition charges against journalists in India

Published October 22, 2020
The Interna­tional Press Institute and the International Federation of Journalists have expressed grave concern over the increasing use of sedition charges against journalists in India. — Reuters/File
The Interna­tional Press Institute and the International Federation of Journalists have expressed grave concern over the increasing use of sedition charges against journalists in India. — Reuters/File

KARACHI: The Interna­tional Press Institute (IPI), a global network of editors, media executives and leading journalists for press freedom, and the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), a global federation of national journalists’ unions and associations, have expressed grave concern over the increasing use of sedition charges against journalists in India.

In a letter addressed to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the two global associations said that over the past few months, a number of journalists have been charged under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which punishes sedition with three years to life in prison.

They recalled that on Oct 5, a Kerala-based journalist, Siddique Kappan, who was trying to reach the family of a rape victim in Hathras district of Uttar Pradesh, was arrested and charged with sedition. On Oct 6, the Kerala Union of Working Journalists filed a habeas corpus petition against the arrest of Mr Kappan, who was the union’s Delhi unit Secretary.

Similarly, they said, in May, Dhaval Patel, editor and owner of a Gujarati news portal, ‘Face of Nation’, was charged with sedition and detained by the police for publishing a report that suggested that the political leadership in the state would change. He was also accused of spreading false panic under Section 54 of the Disaster Management Act. The Editors’ Guild of India raised the issue in a statement on May 13 expressing concern over the misuse of special laws, besides sedition and IPC.

Chhattisgarh police filed a sedition case against Kamal Shukla, editor of Bhumkal Samachar, for sharing a cartoon on Facebook that referred to the Supreme Court’s decision to reject petitions calling for an independent investigation into the mysterious death of special Central Bureau of Investiga­tion judge Brijgopal Loya in 2014. The case was brought to the attention of the authorities by the NUJ (I) and IJU.

In another case, the associations said, noted journalist Vinod Dua was charged with sedition by the Himachal Pradesh police. The case was registered against Mr Dua for his YouTube broadcast blaming the government for its Covid-19 preparedness and making personal allegations against Prime Minister Modi.

Published in Dawn, October 22nd, 2020

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...