SC rejects NAB plea to put Shehbaz’s name on ECL

Published October 28, 2020
In this file photo, PML-N president Shehbaz Sharif appears for a hearing at an accountability court in Lahore. — DawnNewsTV
In this file photo, PML-N president Shehbaz Sharif appears for a hearing at an accountability court in Lahore. — DawnNewsTV

ISLAMABAD: The Sup­re­me Court on Tuesday rejected a plea instituted by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to place the name of PML-N president Shehbaz Sharif on the Exit Control List (ECL).

Headed by Justice Mushir Alam, a two-judge Supreme Court bench took up the appeal by NAB against the Lahore High Court’s order of removing the name of Mr Sharif from the ECL in a corruption reference about ama­ssing wealth beyond known sources of his income.

NAB’s Additional Prose­cu­tor Jahanzeb Bharwana pleaded before the apex court that the former chief minister of Punjab was allegedly involved in suspicious transactions, adding that a number of accused involved in money laundering had fled during the inquiry stage whereas six accused had absconded.

He explained to the court that earlier the name of the PML-N president was removed from the ECL on the directives of the LHC, but now much progress had been made in the case.

During the hearing, Justice Muneeb Akhtar observed that the restriction on Mr Sharif’s travelling seemed unnecessary at the time of the high court’s orders, adding that the apex court had already interpreted the anti-money laundering laws in the Justice Qazi Faez Isa presidential reference by holding that suspicious transactions do not fall under corruption charges. Currently, Mr Sharif is in judicial custody.

NAB officials did not even bother to read the verdict of Justice Isa’s case, Justice Akhtar regretted.

Did the former chief minister of Punjab flee after his name was removed from the ECL, asked Justice Akhtar, adding that NAB included Mr Sharif’s name in the ECL during the inquiry stage.

While rejecting the appeal, the Supreme Court also observed that the NAB prosecutor could not identify the culprit in the high court’s decision.

Published in Dawn, October 28th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Kabul visit
26 Mar, 2025

Kabul visit

CONSIDERING the generally poor state of Pak-Afghan relations, the recently concluded three-day visit of Pakistan’s...
Drought warning
26 Mar, 2025

Drought warning

DRIVEN by rising temperatures linked to climate change, increasing drought events across Pakistan have affected tens...
Deadly roads
26 Mar, 2025

Deadly roads

DESPITE daytime restrictions on heavy vehicles, Karachi continues to witness one horrific traffic accident after...
Shortcut tactics
Updated 25 Mar, 2025

Shortcut tactics

IMF’s decision to veto move to reduce retail power tariffs seems to be against interests of middle-class consumers.
Unforced error
Updated 25 Mar, 2025

Unforced error

State must not push ordinary citizens away with its excesses when dealing with Balochistan.
Losing again
25 Mar, 2025

Losing again

WHEN Pakistan’s high-risk Twenty20 approach did not work, there was no fallback plan and they collapsed in a heap...