Bars question SC bench formation for Isa case review pleas

Published October 28, 2020
Four premier bar associations of the country have questioned the hearing of review petitions in the Justice Qazi Faez Isa case by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench from Wednesday. — Photo courtesy SC website/File
Four premier bar associations of the country have questioned the hearing of review petitions in the Justice Qazi Faez Isa case by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench from Wednesday. — Photo courtesy SC website/File

ISLAMABAD: Four premier bar associations of the country have questioned the hearing of review petitions in the Justice Qazi Faez Isa case by a seven-judge Supreme Court bench from Wednesday after a 10-judge full court has heard and decided the constitutional petitions against the filing of the presidential reference.

In their joint but one-page application, the Supreme Court Bar Association, Quetta Bar Association president Mohammad Asif Reki, Punjab Bar Council vice chairman Shahnawaz Ismail and Balochistan Bar Council vice chairman Munir Ahmed Kakar have also requested the SC to postpone the proceedings and place the matter before the Chief Justice of Pakistan to form a larger bench comprising all the judges who had decided the constitutional petitions against the filing of the reference.

Sarina raises doubt over handling of matter by FBR officials

Set to commence the hearing of eight review petitions from Wednesday (today) against the June 19 short order in the Justice Isa case, the seven-judge larger bench comprises Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Manzoor Ahmed Malik, Justice Faisal Arab, Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel, Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, Justice Muneeb Akhtar and Justice Qazi Mohammad Amin.

While deciding the constitutional petitions against the filing of the presidential reference against Justice Isa earlier, the same bench through paragraphs three to 11 in the June 19 short order had quashed the presidential reference filed before Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) yet ordered the Federal Bureau of Revenue (FBR) to seek explanation from his family about their property and furnish a report to the SJC.

Eight review petitions seeking to revisit the paragraphs three to 11 of the court order were filed by the SCBA, Sindh High Court Bar Association, QBA president, Punjab Bar Council vice chairman, Advocate Abid Hassan Minto and Pakistan Bar Council, besides Justice Isa and his wife Sarina.

In the review pleas, the petitioners argued that the directives/observations or contents of paragraphs three to 11 in the June 19 short order were unnecessary, superfluous, contradictory, excessive and unlawful and thus liable to be deleted since it constituted mistake and error apparently on the face of the record and were thus liable to be reviewed and deleted.

In the fresh application, the bar associations contended that the detailed reasons for the June 19 short order were released on Oct 22 and, therefore, the review petitions that had been filed earlier needed to be amended suitably after consultation with the respective petitioners.

Meanwhile, Sarina Isa has raised doubt over the handling of the matter by the FBR officials after a subordinate of the FBR chairman in response to her previous letter disclosed that the report had been “submitted before the honourable Supreme Judicial Council” and that it was “confidential”.

In her fresh letter, dated Oct 27, to FBR (CbCR) secretary Ali Saeed, Ms Isa asked if the report was confidential and only the chairman was supposed to submit it to the SJC, how he was privy to it. She also questioned the ‘secrecy’ being maintained as according to her the official in his letter did not disclose who ordered him to respond to her Oct 9 letter that she had sent to the chairman. She said it seemed the matter was being influenced from the top.

Published in Dawn, October 28th, 2020

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...