Two more Indian prisoners released, IHC told

Published November 6, 2020
The federal government informed the Islamabad High Court (IHC) that in addition to five Indian prisoners, two more prisoners who had completed their jail terms have been released. — AFP/File
The federal government informed the Islamabad High Court (IHC) that in addition to five Indian prisoners, two more prisoners who had completed their jail terms have been released. — AFP/File

ISLAMABAD: The federal government on Thursday informed the Islamabad High Court (IHC) that in addition to five Indian prisoners, two more prisoners who had completed their jail terms have been released.

Additional Attorney General Tariq Mehmood Khokhar, however, said that another accused namely Mohammad Ismail alias Sama Ishmail Alimamd, son of Ali Mohammad Samma, who is presently confined at Malir district jail in Karachi, has not been released.

On Mr Khokhar’s request, IHC Chief Justice Justice Athar Minallah clubbed Ismail’s case with that of Indian spy Kulbhushan Jadhav. The court will take up the matter on Nov 9.

The case of eighth inmate has been clubbed with Jadhav’s

Mr Khokhar informed the court that Jaspal alias Yashpal and Shamsuddin alias Alam had been released in the latest batch of such prisoners, adding that Anil Chimaar alias Anil Kumar, Birju Dung Dung alias Birchu, Vigyan Kumar Ghnshyam Kumar, Satish Bhog and Sonu Singh had previously been released and repatriated to India.

A petition seeking release of these convicted Indian spies contended that “prisoners have completed their respective sentences and the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, mandates in unequivocal terms that no person shall be deprived of life or liberty in accordance with the law. This provision is quite similar to Article 21 of the Constitution of India which deals with protection of life and liberty”.

The petition said that any person belonging to any country tried by Pakistani authorities expected that this glorious protection of law to their life and liberty would be extended to them as a matter of right and dignity. The petition further said that Article 10(A) of the Pakistani Constitution ensured a fair trial of all and Article 4 enjoined that “every other person for the time being within Pakistan under the protection of law, rights of such individual to be dealt with in accordance with law”.

The petition alleged that in spite of these constitutional provisions, the authorities unfortunately had deprived these prisoners of their legitimate rights.

Published in Dawn, November 6th, 2020

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...