Four amended review petitions question Isa case verdict

Published November 13, 2020
Justice Qazi Faez Isa. — Photo courtesy SC website
Justice Qazi Faez Isa. — Photo courtesy SC website

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Thursday received four amended review petitions in which petitioners have questioned the majority judgement in presidential reference against Justice Qazi Faez Isa.

The amended review petitions, however, adopted the reasoning and conclusions drawn by Justice Maqbool Baqar and Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah who dissented from the majority judgement endorsed by seven judges of the 10-judge full court.

The amended petitions were filed by the Supreme Court Bar Association, Balochistan Bar Association, Punjab Bar Council vice chairman Shahnawaz Ismail and Quetta Bar Association president Mohammad Asif Reki through their counsel Hamid Khan.

Under Article 209(8) of the Constitution, it is for the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC), and not the Supreme Court, to issue a code of conduct to be observed by the superior court judges, the amended petitions argued.

Petitioners adopt conclusions drawn by judges who dissented with majority judgement

Thus the majority judgement had rewritten the code of conduct that too retrospectively by mandating that failure of a judge not to make him aware or to make reasonable efforts to be informed about the financial interests of his family members constitutes misconduct, it said.

The code of conduct issued by the SJC was last amended on Aug 8, 2009, but it did not incorporate the Banglore Principles, the draft of which pre-dated the code by almost nine years, the petition said, adding that the Banglore Principles required information about the financial interest of the spouse, son, daughter, son-in-law, daughter-in-law and any other close relative or person who was a companion or employee of the judge and who lived in the judge’s household.

In fact, the adoption by the United Nations Economic and Social Council of the Banglore Principles took place almost three years prior to the last amendment to in the code of conduct and such principles themselves urged that effective measure be adopted by the national judiciaries to provide mechanisms to implement these principles, the petition said.

Published in Dawn, November 13th, 2020

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...