ISLAMABAD: Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui, a former judge of the Islamabad High Court (IHC), on Monday wrote another letter to Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Gulzar Ahmed for early fixing of his appeal.

“In these peculiar circumstances, I humbly request your lordship to issue the necessary directions to the [court]office to immediately fix the matter for hearing,” Mr Siddiqui said in his two-page letter.

Apparently, this is the third letter the petitioner has written to the CJP for early hearing of his case.

Earlier, on Sept 24, a five-judge Supreme Court bench headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial, which had taken up his appeal against the Oct 11, 2018 notification of his removal as a judge, had asked senior counsel Hamid Khan, who was representing the former judge, to wait for a final judgement in the Justice Qazi Faez Isa case that would be announced soon.

Shaukat Siddiqui was removed for displaying conduct unbecoming of a judge

The majority judgement, along with the dissenting note of Justice Yayha Afridi, in the Justice Isa case was issued on Oct 23. Later, the dissenting notes of Justice Maqbool Baqar and Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah were issued on Nov 4.

The the five-judge SC bench had postponed the proceedings for a month.

In his letter, the former judge had stated that the rights available to an ordinary citizen/litigant would not be denied to him and he would not be discriminated by the court office through subjective approach.

The subject matter of the letter concerns the prolonged delay in disposal of constitutional petition 76/2018 titled Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui versus the federation of Pakistan.

The letter highlighted that he had been out of office since Oct 11, 2018 and that he had not been employed again. “It is universally recognised principle of law that ‘justice delayed is justice denied’,” it added.

“My case is a peculiar example of the same where despite clear orders of the bench, the petition was never fixed on its own and every time, I had to approach your lordship [CJP] through written applications.

“To my utter surprise and disappointment more than two months lapsed but there is no action on the part of the office regarding fixing of the petition,” the former judge said.

Mr Siddiqui was removed from the high judicial office on the recommendation of the Supreme Judicial Council under Article 209 of the Constitution for displaying a conduct unbecoming of a judge for delivering a speech on July 21, 2018, at the District Bar Association, Rawalpindi.

Published in Dawn, December 1st, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Kurram atrocity
Updated 22 Nov, 2024

Kurram atrocity

It would be a monumental mistake for the state to continue ignoring the violence in Kurram.
Persistent grip
22 Nov, 2024

Persistent grip

An audit of polio funds at federal and provincial levels is sorely needed, with obstacles hindering eradication efforts targeted.
Green transport
22 Nov, 2024

Green transport

THE government has taken a commendable step by announcing a New Energy Vehicle policy aiming to ensure that by 2030,...
Military option
Updated 21 Nov, 2024

Military option

While restoring peace is essential, addressing Balochistan’s socioeconomic deprivation is equally important.
HIV/AIDS disaster
21 Nov, 2024

HIV/AIDS disaster

A TORTUROUS sense of déjà vu is attached to the latest health fiasco at Multan’s Nishtar Hospital. The largest...
Dubious pardon
21 Nov, 2024

Dubious pardon

IT is disturbing how a crime as grave as custodial death has culminated in an out-of-court ‘settlement’. The...