JCP meets today to discuss elevation of two lawyers as IHC judges

Published December 3, 2020
Picked by IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah for the coveted posts, the nominees are Babar Sattar and Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri. — IHC website/File
Picked by IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah for the coveted posts, the nominees are Babar Sattar and Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri. — IHC website/File

ISLAMABAD: The Judi­cial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) is expected to deliberate on Thursday over the elevation of two prominent lawyers to the position of judge of the Islamabad High Court (IHC).

Picked by IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah for the coveted posts, the nominees are Babar Sattar and Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri.

The JCP is also expected to consider elevation to fill the office of the chief justice of the Peshawar High Court which fell vacant after the death of Justice Waqar Seth, who died of coronavirus on Nov 13.

As commanded by Article 175-A of the Constitution, the JCP meeting will be presided over by Chief Justice of Pakistan Gulzar Ahmed and attended by the IHC chief justice in addition to four senior most judges of the Supreme Court, namely Justice Mushir Alam, Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Qazi Faez Isa and Justice Maqbool Baqar.

Senior puisne judge of the IHC Justice Aamer Farooq will also attend the JCP meeting in addition to federal Law Minister Dr Farogh Naseem, Attorney General for Pakistan Khalid Jawed Khan, and Senior Advocate nominated by the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) Akhtar Hussain. Islamabad Bar Council’s Vice Chairman Qazi Rafiuddin Babar is also a member of the JCP.

Already the antecedents committee headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial and the professional committee under Justice Mushir Alam had met to consider the nominations for the IHC.

Interestingly, when the JCP will consider the recommendations forwarded by the IHC CJ, Justice Qazi Faez Isa will also be sitting in the meeting who was recently represented by Babar Sattar before a ten-judge full court of the Supreme Court hearing his petition against the filing of the presidential reference which was quashed by the court. Before the Supreme Court, Babar Sattar had mainly focused his arguments around the Income Tax laws and the implication of Section 116 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

Mr Sattar had tried to convince the apex court through his arguments that the tax liability was a matter between the citizen and the state and no tax demand could be generated against the citizen except by competent authority under the tax laws.

Published in Dawn, December 3rd, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Islamabad march
Updated 27 Nov, 2024

Islamabad march

WITH emotions running high, chaos closes in. As these words were being written, rumours and speculation were all...
Policing the internet
27 Nov, 2024

Policing the internet

IT is chilling to witness how Pakistan — a nation that embraced the freedoms of modern democracy, and the tech ...
Correcting sports priorities
27 Nov, 2024

Correcting sports priorities

IT has been a lingering battle that has cast a shadow over sports in Pakistan: who are the national sports...
Kurram ceasefire
Updated 26 Nov, 2024

Kurram ceasefire

DESPITE efforts by the KP government to bring about a ceasefire in Kurram tribal district, the bloodletting has...
Hollow victory
26 Nov, 2024

Hollow victory

THE conclusion of COP29 in Baku has left developing nations — struggling with the mounting costs of climate...
Infrastructure schemes
26 Nov, 2024

Infrastructure schemes

THE government’s decision to finance priority PSDP schemes on a three-year rolling basis is a significant step...