Ex-MPA summoned over Imran’s plea to consolidate defamation suits

Published February 16, 2021
A single-member Peshawar High Court bench on Monday summoned former woman MPA Meraj Humayun Khan. — APP/File
A single-member Peshawar High Court bench on Monday summoned former woman MPA Meraj Humayun Khan. — APP/File

PESHAWAR: A single-member Peshawar High Court bench on Monday summoned former woman MPA Meraj Humayun Khan for responding to a petition of Prime Minister Imran Khan seeking the consolidation of two pending defamation suits filed against him by her and another former woman MPA, Fauzia Bibi.

Chief Justice Qaiser Rashid Khan fixed Feb 22 for the next hearing into the petition wherein the premier minister also requested the court to transfer Ms Fauzia’s lawsuit from a Peshawar court to a Swabi court, which is hearing Ms Meraj’s case.

Both the former lawmakers have filed lawsuits against Mr Imran for publicly accusing them of selling votes in the 2018 Senate elections.

Ms Fauzia was elected an MPA on one of the seats reserved for women in the 2013 elections on the PTI ticket, while Ms Meraj was elected on the ticket of the Qaumi Watan Party but joined the PTI in Mar 2018.

High court fixes next hearing into petition for Feb 22

Deputy attorney general Mohammad Habib Qureshi appeared for the petitioner and said the court hearing the case of Ms Fauzia had ordered ex parte proceedings against Mr Imran on Feb 13 for not being properly assisted.

He said the premier had submitted an application to the trial court insisting as the case transfer petition was pending with the high court, hearing into the lawsuit should be adjourned.

Mr Qureshi said Mr Imran had requested the court in that application to grant him time to file reply to the lawsuit.

He requested the court to issue a stay order against proceedings by the trial court until the transfer petition is decided.

The chief justice observed that the high court won’t stop the trial court from proceedings as doing so was the latter’s domain.

Lawyer Syed Ghufranullah Shah appeared for Ms Fauzia and contended that the trial court had ordered ex parte proceedings against the premier as his counsel had not been appearing before it and was using different tactics to prolong the trial.

He argued that the cases of Ms Fauzia and Meraj Humayun were of different nature, so they couldn’t be consolidated.

Ms Fauzia told the bench that she was a cancer patient and had regularly been visiting the trial court for over two years but the trial was still under way due to the delaying tactics of Mr Imran. She requested the court not to transfer her case from the current court. The bench observed that it would decide the issue after hearing all parties.

As Ms Meraj did not turn up, the bench issued another notice to her for appearance on Feb 22.

PM’S APPLICATION: Prime Minister Imran Khan on Monday moved Peshawar’s additional district and sessions judge Abdul Majid seeking the cancellation of his order to begin ex parte proceedings against him in the defamation suit filed by Fauzia Bibi and allow him to contest the lawsuit on merit.

His application was filed by deputy attorney general Habib Qureshi insisting the premier has properly been represented by his counsel in the case and that his lawyer couldn’t appear before it on the last hearing as he had to travel to Karachi for the medical treatment of his wife.

He said the non-appearance of the counsel on the previous hearing wasn’t willful.

The application said the court had wrongly assumed that neither the defendant (Mr Imran) nor his pleader ever appeared before it in the case.

It added that the defendant was fully interested and ready to defend the false lawsuit right from day one and therefore, the ex parte proceeding order was liable to be recalled.

The applications said the lawsuit should be heard by providing opportunity to the defendant to defend himself.

The court will hear the application on Feb 20.

Published in Dawn, February 16th, 2021

Opinion

From hard to harder

From hard to harder

Instead of ‘hard state’ turning even harder, citizens deserve a state that goes soft on them in delivering democratic and development aspirations.

Editorial

Canal unrest
Updated 03 Apr, 2025

Canal unrest

With rising water scarcity in Indus system, it is crucial to move towards a consensus-driven policymaking process.
Iran-US tension
03 Apr, 2025

Iran-US tension

THE Trump administration’s threats aimed at Iran do not bode well for global peace, and unless Washington changes...
Flights to history
03 Apr, 2025

Flights to history

MOHENJODARO could have been the forgotten gold we desperately need. Instead, this 5,000-year-old well of antiquity ...
Eid amidst crises
Updated 31 Mar, 2025

Eid amidst crises

Until the Muslim world takes practical steps to end these atrocities, these besieged populations will see no joy.
Women’s rights
Updated 01 Apr, 2025

Women’s rights

Such judgements, and others directly impacting women’s rights should be given more airtime in media.
Not helping
Updated 02 Apr, 2025

Not helping

If it's committed to peace in Balochistan, the state must draw a line between militancy and legitimate protest.