13 years on, Neelum-Jhelum surcharge set to go

Published February 18, 2021
Having collected about Rs100 billion, the government has decided in principle to finally do away with Neelum-Jhelum surcharge. — Photo by Kohi Marri/File
Having collected about Rs100 billion, the government has decided in principle to finally do away with Neelum-Jhelum surcharge. — Photo by Kohi Marri/File

ISLAMABAD: Having collected about Rs100 billion, the government has decided in principle to finally do away with Neelum-Jhelum surcharge, currently applied to all electricity consumers at the rate of 10 paisa per unit, after 13 years.

A summary to this effect is expected to be approved by the Economic Coordina­tion Committee (ECC) of the Cabinet in its meeting on Friday that is also expected to provide tax relaxations to Chinese companies involved in development of hydropower projects in Azad Kashmir.

To be presided over by Finance Minister Dr Hafeez Shaikh, the ECC is also expected to approve a supplementary grant to Special Communications Organisa­tion (SCO) during the current fiscal year, outstanding payment of Ocean Wide Shipping Services of Germany by Pakistan Steel Mills and revision in prices of essential commodities for provision of subsidy under PM’s Relief Package 2020.

The meeting will also take up a communication support to Ehsas Prog­ramme, constitution of a committee for resolution of taxation issues in the information technology and telecom sector and issuance of a sovereign guarantee to National Electronics Com­plex of Pakistan.

A senior government official told Dawn that Power Division of the Ministry of Energy has moved a summary for doing away with the surcharge with immediate effect because of widespread criticism from various parliamentary bodies. On approval, a formal notification would be issued immediately to stop collection of the surcharge through electricity bills.

Responding to question about reports of replacing it with some other project specific char­ges for financing of Diamer-Basha and Mohmand dams, the official said the government may have some considerations about such things but that was not part of the instant summary.

The surcharge was imposed in 2007 for part financing of Neelum-Jhelum Hydropower Pro­ject with a sunset clause of Dec 31, 2015 — the completion target of the project started at the time with an estimated cost of Rs130bn. It was envisaged that half of the financing would be generated through this surcharge on every unit of electricity sold to consumers in eight years.

The cost of 969-megawatt run of the river project in Azad Kashmir, however, kept on increasing and was completed in 2018 at about Rs500bn. The 10-paisa per unit surcharge was ex­­tended for one year and another 18 months until July 1, 2018 but has continued until now. By 2018, an amount of Rs75bn had been collected. Depen­ding on power consumption, the annual surcharge generates about Rs10bn per annum.

Published in Dawn, February 18th, 2021

Follow Dawn Business on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

Kurram atrocity
Updated 22 Nov, 2024

Kurram atrocity

It would be a monumental mistake for the state to continue ignoring the violence in Kurram.
Persistent grip
22 Nov, 2024

Persistent grip

An audit of polio funds at federal and provincial levels is sorely needed, with obstacles hindering eradication efforts targeted.
Green transport
22 Nov, 2024

Green transport

THE government has taken a commendable step by announcing a New Energy Vehicle policy aiming to ensure that by 2030,...
Military option
Updated 21 Nov, 2024

Military option

While restoring peace is essential, addressing Balochistan’s socioeconomic deprivation is equally important.
HIV/AIDS disaster
21 Nov, 2024

HIV/AIDS disaster

A TORTUROUS sense of déjà vu is attached to the latest health fiasco at Multan’s Nishtar Hospital. The largest...
Dubious pardon
21 Nov, 2024

Dubious pardon

IT is disturbing how a crime as grave as custodial death has culminated in an out-of-court ‘settlement’. The...