Accused can’t be left to rot in jail for indefinite period: LHC

Published February 27, 2021
The Lahore High Court has observed that an accused person cannot be left at the mercy of the prosecution to rot in jail for an indefinite period. — AFP/File
The Lahore High Court has observed that an accused person cannot be left at the mercy of the prosecution to rot in jail for an indefinite period. — AFP/File

LAHORE: In a detailed verdict issued on the post-arrest bail petition of Leader of Opposition in Punjab Assembly Hamza Shehbaz in the money- laundering reference, the Lahore High Court has observed that an accused person cannot be left at the mercy of the prosecution to rot in jail for an indefinite period.

A two-judge bench comprising Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar and Justice Asjad Javed Ghural had granted bail to Hamza and two employees of his family business through a short order on Feb 24. The NAB had arrested Hamza on June 11, 2019.

The judgement authored by Justice Dogar rules that the inordinate delay in conclusion of trial cannot be lightly ignored provided it is not caused due to any act of omission of the accused as had been held by the Supreme Court.

The bench observes that the record of the trial proceedings reflects that the petitioners along with their counsel attended all hearings except some occasions, adjournments have been sought by their co-accused for one reason or the other and on some occasions due to the absence of presiding officer or due to non-production of the accused from jail.

Bench issues detailed verdict on Hamza’s bail in graft case

The bench also notes some adjournments in the trial due to unavailability of the defence counsel, however, remarks that this cannot be attributed to the petitioners and only few adjournments of negligible numbers were sought by the petitioners and that too for the reason of appearance before the higher forum.

It states even otherwise, the petitioners are not the principal accused, they are on lower pedestal and their case is not on a par with their co-accused Shehbaz Sharif, the leader of the opposition in National Assembly, who is the principal accused in the reference and still behind the bars.

The bench also refers to a report submitted before the SC wherein the trial court gives its tentative assessment that at least 10 to 12 months’ time is required for the conclusion of the trial provided full participation and cooperation of all the accused persons and prosecution is ensured.

It also depicts from the report that the number of trial of the petitioners is the third last case out of a total of 46 cases pending before the trial court and the SC was not of the view to jump over the trial of the petitioners.

“We are of the considered view that it is a fit case whereby bail is to be granted as no exceptional ground exists to deprive the petitioners from their liberty by refusing their post-arrest bails,” the judges wrote in the decision.

Hamza and others are likely to be released from jail on Saturday (today) as the release order by the trial court is yet to be issued.

Published in Dawn, February 27th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Monetary policy
05 Nov, 2024

Monetary policy

IN an aggressive move, the State Bank on Monday reduced its key policy rate by a hefty 250bps to 15pc. This is the...
Cultural power
05 Nov, 2024

Cultural power

AS vital modes of communication, art and culture have the power to overcome social and international barriers....
Disregarding CCI
Updated 04 Nov, 2024

Disregarding CCI

The failure to regularly convene CCI meetings means that the process of democratic decision-making is falling apart.
Defeating TB
04 Nov, 2024

Defeating TB

CONSIDERING the fact that Pakistan has the fifth highest burden of tuberculosis in the world as per the World Health...
Ceasefire charade
Updated 04 Nov, 2024

Ceasefire charade

The US talks of peace, while simultaneously arming and funding their Israeli allies, are doomed to fail, and are little more than a charade.
Concerning measures
Updated 03 Nov, 2024

Concerning measures

The govt must seek political input and consensus on the changes it is seeking to make and be open about its intentions.