Reham, Zulfi battle it out in UK defamation case

Published July 3, 2021
This combination file photo shows  former special assistant to the prime minister Zulfi Bukhari and the PM's former wife and journalist Reham Khan. — Dawn
This combination file photo shows former special assistant to the prime minister Zulfi Bukhari and the PM's former wife and journalist Reham Khan. — Dawn

LONDON: In a preliminary hearing of a defamation case brought by the former special assistant to the prime minister, Zulfi Bukhari, against PM’s former wife and journalist Reham Khan, a UK judge determined the meaning of the content at the centre of the suit.

The judge found during the hearing that the words and material disseminated by Ms Khan amounted to a chase level 1 imputation. As determined by the judge, this means the defamatory words would be understood by an “ordinary reasonable reader” as actual guilt on the part of Mr Bukhari. If the case goes to trial, Ms Khan would be expected to substantiate her allegations against Mr Bukhari.

On Dec 6, 2019, Ms Khan had in a YouTube broadcast talked about the sale of Roosevelt Hotel in Manhattan and raised the question of Mr Bukhari’s alleged involvement in the sale. The broadcast was subsequently shared on social media.

Ms Khan had in the broadcast questioned the National Crime Agency’s settlement with Bahria Town developer Malik Riaz, but later alleged that Manchester-based businessman Anil Mussarat and Mr Bukhari may be involved in the sale of the hotel or gain an unfair advantage by purchasing it at a low market price.

Ms Khan had alleged: “If the news my source gave me is correct, that these two overseas British Pakistanis Anil Mussarat and Zulfi Bukhari are involved in the sale of the Roosevelt Hotel, then it is selective justice... Malik Riaz may have been tolerated but not this.”

The following year, after Mr Mussarat served a defamation notice on Ms Khan, the latter issued an apology, restricted her comments and removed the video from her YouTube channel.

Mr Bukhari objected to the allegations and served a libel case against Ms Khan, saying he was targeted and accused of corruption.

Ms Khan maintained that the words do not amount to defamation and did not significantly damage Mr Bukhari’s reputation as he has claimed. She also argued that any discussions on the sale of the Roosevelt Hotel fall under the banner of public interest. She also said her broadcast was “based on information that the aviation ministry had objected to the creation of the task force on Roosevelt”.

Mr Bukhari is seeking retraction, damages and cost of legal fees as part of the defamation case.

The judge did not accept Ms Khan’s assessment of the publications’ meaning. His lawyer argued that his client had been defamed at the highest level as he had been declared guilty of corruption and dishonesty.

In the absence of an out-of-court settlement, the defamation trial is expected to commence later this year.

Published in Dawn, July 3rd, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Smog hazard
Updated 05 Nov, 2024

Smog hazard

The catastrophe unfolding in Lahore is a product of authorities’ repeated failure to recognise environmental impact of rapid urbanisation.
Monetary policy
05 Nov, 2024

Monetary policy

IN an aggressive move, the State Bank on Monday reduced its key policy rate by a hefty 250bps to 15pc. This is the...
Cultural power
05 Nov, 2024

Cultural power

AS vital modes of communication, art and culture have the power to overcome social and international barriers....
Disregarding CCI
Updated 04 Nov, 2024

Disregarding CCI

The failure to regularly convene CCI meetings means that the process of democratic decision-making is falling apart.
Defeating TB
04 Nov, 2024

Defeating TB

CONSIDERING the fact that Pakistan has the fifth highest burden of tuberculosis in the world as per the World Health...
Ceasefire charade
Updated 04 Nov, 2024

Ceasefire charade

The US talks of peace, while simultaneously arming and funding their Israeli allies, are doomed to fail, and are little more than a charade.