Civil suit summons should be bilingual, observes LHC

Published August 11, 2021
The verdict came on a civil revision petition filed by Amar Jeet Singh against Sant Singh of Nankana Sahib. — Wikimedia Commons/File
The verdict came on a civil revision petition filed by Amar Jeet Singh against Sant Singh of Nankana Sahib. — Wikimedia Commons/File

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) has observed that the summons in civil suits involving summary proceedings need to be bilingual i.e. in English and Urdu languages.

The purpose of such a summons is to convey a summary of the claim against a defendant, inform him of his entitlement to apply for leave to appear and defend the suit, warn him of the urgency in moving such an application within the limitation period of 10 days as well as of the consequences of his default, says Justice Raheel Kamran Sheikh in a verdict.

Such content attempts to satisfy one of the essential requirements of the fundamental right to fair trial, he adds.

The judge observes that a summons assumes that the defendant served is able to read English or that he has assistance available to him to convey the content of the same, which is questionable as majority of the people in our society are unable to read English or may not have such assistance available to them. Resultantly, he maintains, the purpose of the summons currently prescribed runs an obvious risk of being defeated.

Says Urdu is needed for fair trial

Justice Sheikh observes that the notion that this type of summons satisfies the requirement of fair trial right is more of a fiction, which is permissible only if actual summons in a language that the recipient can understand is not feasible.

“Right to fair trial is a fundamental right guaranteed to all and not just English literate persons in this society,” he adds.

The judge notes that the Supreme Court as well as the LHC, to facilitate access to justice and ensure fair trial right, have already adopted the practice of serving various notices in Urdu language.

The judge has directed the registrar office to send a copy of the judgement to the federal law secretary and the law secretary of Punjab for appropriate action in this regard.

The verdict came on a civil revision petition filed by Amar Jeet Singh against Sant Singh of Nankana Sahib. A district court had closed the right of the petitioner for leave to defend a suit filed by the respondent. The LHC allowed the civil revision of Amar Jeet Singh.

Published in Dawn, August 11th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

A hasty retreat
Updated 28 Nov, 2024

A hasty retreat

Govt should not extend its campaign of violence against PTI and its leaders, thinking it now has the upper hand. Enough is enough.
Lebanon truce
28 Nov, 2024

Lebanon truce

WILL it hold? That is the question many in the Middle East and beyond will be asking after a 60-day ceasefire ...
MDR anomaly removed
28 Nov, 2024

MDR anomaly removed

THE State Bank’s decision to remove its minimum deposit rate requirement for conventional banks on deposits from...
Islamabad march
Updated 27 Nov, 2024

Islamabad march

WITH emotions running high, chaos closes in. As these words were being written, rumours and speculation were all...
Policing the internet
27 Nov, 2024

Policing the internet

IT is chilling to witness how Pakistan — a nation that embraced the freedoms of modern democracy, and the tech ...
Correcting sports priorities
27 Nov, 2024

Correcting sports priorities

IT has been a lingering battle that has cast a shadow over sports in Pakistan: who are the national sports...