IHC issues notice to PPRA over ‘forged documents’

Published September 7, 2021
This file photo shows the Islamabad High Court. — IHC website/File
This file photo shows the Islamabad High Court. — IHC website/File

ISLAMABAD: The Islam­abad High Court on Monday issued a notice to the Pak­istan Procurement Regula­tory Authority (PPRA) for allegedly securing a favourable order from the court on the basis of forged documents.

Justice Aamer Farooq of the IHC issued the notice to the PPRA managing director on a petition filed by the authority’s ex-director general accusing the former of submitting forged documents that led to dismissal of his petition as well as three other pleas of senior officials against their termination from service.

PPRA, the country’s top transparency watchdog, was established in 2002 through a presidential ordinance, according to its official website.

The authority is endowed with the responsibility of prescribing regulations and procedures for public procurements by federal government-owned public sector organisations with a view to improving governance, management, transparency, accountability and quality of public procurement of goods, works and services.

In 2019, then PPRA managing director Fida Mohammad Wazir had terminated directors general Saima Tasneem and Irfan Rafique, director Dr Saqib Yousaf and deputy director Rahila Yousaf from service.

The high court had dismissed the petitions of sacked employees after PPRA submitted that the board of directors of the authority had in its 37th meeting delegated the power of termination to the managing director.

The counsel for the petitioners argued before the court that the matter was placed before the Pakistan Information Commission (PIC) and it transpired that the delegation of the power to the PPRA managing director was not correct and based on a forged instrument.

According to the petition, the PIC concluded that the minutes of the board’s meeting held on April 1, 2019 were forged and on the basis of the forged documents the court ruled in favour of the PPRA.

It pointed out that the IHC “while passing order on Feb 18, 2020 observed in para eight of the order that the authority may delegate its functions or powers to the managing director which accordingly was done by the board of the authority in the minutes of 37th [meeting] of Public Procurement Regulatory Authority board held on April 1… but the whole para 11 (b) of 37th board meeting was forged as observed in the PIC report dated January 13, 2021”.

The petition stated that “under the changed circumstances, law allows the applicant to move application under Section 12 (2) of CPC as fraud and misrepresentation have been caused to the applicant”.

Justice Farooq admitted the petition and sought report from the respondents.

Further hearing on the matter has been adjourned till a date to be fixed by the court’s registrar office.

Published in Dawn, September 7th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Personal priorities
Updated 21 Mar, 2025

Personal priorities

Pet projects launched by govt often found to be poorly conceived, ripe for exploitation, misaligned with country’s overall development priorities.
Inheritance rights
21 Mar, 2025

Inheritance rights

THE Federal Shariat Court’s ruling that it is un-Islamic to deprive a woman of her right to inheritance is a...
Anti-Muslim actions
21 Mar, 2025

Anti-Muslim actions

MUSLIMS in India have endured incessant scrutiny of their nationalism. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ...
Victim complex
Updated 20 Mar, 2025

Victim complex

If New Delhi is sincere about bringing peace to South Asia, let it agree to an unconditional dialogue with Islamabad about all irritants.
LSM decline
20 Mar, 2025

LSM decline

THE slump in large-scale manufacturing amidst the adjustments the economy is forced to make in order to stay afloat...
Education interrupted
20 Mar, 2025

Education interrupted

THE sudden closure of major universities in Balochistan, ostensibly due to ‘security concerns’, marks another...