Lack of security at charged parking spaces angers SHC

Published November 10, 2021
This file photo shows a street in Karachi crowded with parked cars.  ─ Photo by Khurram Amin/File
This file photo shows a street in Karachi crowded with parked cars. ─ Photo by Khurram Amin/File

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Tuesday expressed anger at the Karachi Metropolitan Corporation (KMC) for charging money for parking of cars and motorcycles in different areas without providing any security and other facilities.

A two-judge bench headed by Justice Zafar Ahmed Rajput took exception to the failure of the director-charged parking of the District Municipal Corporation-South in filing comments despite earlier court directives.

It directed him to be in attendance on Dec 1 and file parawise comments on the next hearing without fail.

The bench remarked that despite receiving parking fee there was no facility or protection for the vehicles, which were being stolen from such parking spaces.

The bench points out people’s vehicles are being stolen despite paying parking fee

A petition was filed against provincial, traffic and local authorities seeking directives for them to remove illegal and unlawful parking spots and ensure the smooth flow of traffic on the roads of the provincial metropolis.

The petitioner also sought a restraining order for the respondents from charging heavy and excess fees for parking of vehicles.

He submitted that “double parking” was being illegally allowed on various thoroughfares of the city causing massive traffic jams.

Citing the Sindh chief secretary, Karachi commissioner, DIG-traffic police, KMC, director-charged parking, DMC-South and others as respondents, the petitioner further submitted that there were many illegal parking lots being run by private parties in collusion with the respondents without any auction or legal way.

Only last month, another bench of the SHC while hearing a different petition filed against charged parking had directed the DIG-traffic and all DMCs to file comments on Nov 29 and also assist the court whether there was any structure available to regulate charged parking in the Karachi.

The bench had also asked the authorities under which law the parking fee was being charged from citizens and who had authorised parking of vehicles on roads as in several areas both sides of the thoroughfares were being used for parking disturbing the flow of traffic.

A citizen filed a petition stating that the Supreme Court had clearly restrained the authorities concerned from charging fee on the pretext of parking, but the respondents were still charging such a fee in different parts of the city by using public spaces in violation of the apex court order.

Published in Dawn, November 10th, 2021

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

JUST how much longer does the government plan on throttling the internet is a question up in the air right now....
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...