Executive’s order not enforceable sans legal backing: LHC

Published November 11, 2021
A file photo of the Lahore High Court building. — APP
A file photo of the Lahore High Court building. — APP

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has observed that any order passed by an executive, howsoever high, is not enforceable until and unless backed by the law.

Justice Shujaat Ali Khan observed this while dismissing a petition of a terminated official of the Lahore Development Authority (LDA), seeking implementation of an order passed by the chief minister’s office for his reinstatement.

Zahid Latif Bhatti, the petitioner, had been serving in the LDA as a sub-engineer and was dismissed from service for absence from duty.

Being aggrieved by the order passed by the competent authority, the petitioner filed an appeal which was dismissed by the LDA’s additional director general.

The petitioner filed a revision petition which was also turned down on the ground that no second appeal was provided against penultimate order.

Subsequently, he filed an application before the Punjab chief minister for his reinstatement in service, whereupon a directive was issued in 2006 by the CM office for reinstatement of the petitioner “on humanitarian ground”.

Instead of implementing the directive, the LDA asked the CM office to review the same. However, the LDA was directed to implement the order, but the authority did not implement it.

The petitioner subsequently filed an application to the prime minister, upon which Punjab governor was directed to look into the matter as per the rules.

The governor’s secretariat directed the LDA to proceed in the matter in accordance with rules but no action was taken thereon. The petitioner again filed an application before the LDA director general for reinstatement, but director administration refused to consider his request.

The petitioner through his counsel argued before the court that since the chief minister was the competent authority as per section 2 of the Punjab Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, therefore, the order passed by him (CM) was to be implemented by the respondents.

On the other hand, LDA’s counsel argued that since the petitioner was proceeded against under the Punjab Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, therefore, after availing the remedy of one appeal, he could not file second appeal, thus the order passed by the CM was not binding for the respondents.

In the ruling, Justice Khan observes that the directive issued by the CM secretariat shows that reinstatement of the petitioner was directed on “humanitarian grounds” and the said ground being alien to law on the subject was not justified.

“I am of the view that an order passed by an Executive, how so high, is not enforceable by the public functionaries until and unless it has the backing of law,” the judge maintains.

Published in Dawn, November 11th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Mixed signals
Updated 28 Dec, 2024

Mixed signals

If Imran wants talks to yield results, he should authorise PTI’s committee to fully engage with the other side without setting deadlines.
Opaque trials
Updated 28 Dec, 2024

Opaque trials

Secretive trials, shielded from scrutiny, fail to provide the answers that citizens deserve.
A friendly neighbour
28 Dec, 2024

A friendly neighbour

FORMER Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh who passed away on Thursday at 92 was a renowned economist who pulled ...
Desperate measures
Updated 27 Dec, 2024

Desperate measures

Sadly in Pakistan, street protests and sit-ins have become the only resort to catch the attention of a callous power elite.
Economic outlook
27 Dec, 2024

Economic outlook

THE post-pandemic years, marked by extreme volatility in the global oil and commodity markets as well as slowing...
Cricket and visas
27 Dec, 2024

Cricket and visas

PAKISTAN has asserted that delay in the announcement of the schedule of next year’s Champions Trophy will not...