LHC orders inquiry into Indian’s claim to property

Published November 28, 2021
This file photo shows the Lahore High Court. — AFP/File
This file photo shows the Lahore High Court. — AFP/File

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has directed the chief settlement commissioner of Punjab to hold an inquiry to find out any allotment of property made in the name of an Indian citizen in Pakistan.

The court issued this order while dismissing a petition challenging an order of a Lahore’s civil court in litigation among the legal heirs of Muhammad Umar who died in 2002 in India.

The legal heirs are also permanent residents of India and one of them had initiated a civil litigation through a special attorney for the transfer of land allotted to their predecessor being an evacuee citizen.

Abdul Rehman and other heirs submitted through counsel that Umar was a displaced person and was allotted land measuring 23 kanal 9 marla at Malku village in Lahore Cantonment in 1955. They said Umar was in possession of the land in question and died in 2002 and after his death, one Mumriaz Khan fraudulently got entered in the revenue record inheritance mutation which was later cancelled in 2004.

They said they were legal heirs of Umar and they also got a decree from the civil court in 2009.

Justice Chaudhry Muhammad Iqbal, in his verdict, observes that the record of the suit shows that the petitioners are permanent residents of India and that Umar, predecessor of the petitioners, was also a permanent resident of India who never migrated to Pakistan.

The judge observes that Umar was not an evacuee person and was not entitled for any allotment against any evacuee claim in Pakistan and if he had obtained any allotment that was the result of manifest fraud, forgery and misrepresentation.

“The petitioners are also permanent residents of India who are pursuing the instant proceedings of this petition through their special attorney, as such, they are legally debarred to claim any allotment as evacuee persons in Pakistan,” the judge adds.

The judge dismissed the petition being devoid of any force with cost of Rs500,000 to be recovered as arrears of land revenue.

The judge also directed the chief settlement commissioner to conduct a detailed inquiry as to whether any allotment exists in the names of Muhammad Umar, predecessor of the petitioners, or the petitioners and if any other allotment is found to be in existence in record, the commissioner shall cancel the same forthwith and retrieve possession of the land in favour of the state.

Published in Dawn, November 28th, 2021

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...