QUETTA: A division bench of the Balochistan High Cou­rt, comprising Chief Jus­tice Naeem Akhtar Afghan and Justice Abdul Hameed Baloch, on Thursday heard a constitutional petition filed against the Sui Southern Gas Company (SSGC) and the Quetta Electric Supply Company (Qesco) regarding bills and additional charges.

Petitioner Advocate Syed Nazeer Agha, SSGC’s lawyer Kamran Murtaza, Rukh­sana Kakar, the deputy attorney general, and others appeared before the court.

Advocate Murtaza, on be­­half of SSGC, stated that the constitutional petition filed by Advocate Agha and others is not admissible. Con­­­sumers should have appro­ached the Consumer Court, Ogra and other forums.

Mr Agha said that the constitutional petition was filed in public interest. He said PUG/slow meter charges were not being sent to consumers in Karachi, Lahore, Islamabad and other cities. “PUG/Slow meters are being sent to the people of Balo­ch­istan only which is an injustice with them,” he added.

He showed the gas bills of consumers of Karachi and Islamabad and said these bills of up to Rs160 and Rs250 had been sent to consumers. These bills do not even include PUG / slow meter charges and PUG / GST columns whereas consumers in Quetta are being charged Rs40,000 PUG charges. He said it was a violation of Article 25 of the Constitution.

During the last hearing, Justice Baloch observed that proper supply of gas to Ziarat, Quetta, Pishin, Kalat and Mastung should be ensured and gas pressure should be maintained in Ziarat. He said meters should not be taken off in the absence of consumers. If the company has any complaint, then meters should be taken off in the presence of consumers.

An advertisement published in newspapers by SSGC was also presented and the court was informed that the step was taken for the convenience of the people.

Advocate Agha requested the court that the next hearing be fixed for Dec 9 instead of Dec 16 as winter vacations are about to begin in the court while SSGC lawyer Advocate Murtaza told the court that he was leaving the country. Therefore, the next hearing should be fixed for Dec 16.

The court adjourned the hearing to Dec 16.

Published in Dawn, December 3rd, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

United stance
Updated 13 Nov, 2024

United stance

It would've been better if the OIC-Arab League summit had announced practical measures to punish Israel.
Unscheduled visit
13 Nov, 2024

Unscheduled visit

Unusual IMF visit shows the lender will closely watch implementation of programme goals to prevent it from derailing.
Bara’s businesswomen
13 Nov, 2024

Bara’s businesswomen

Bara’s brave women have proven that with the right support, societal barriers can be overcome.
System failure
Updated 12 Nov, 2024

System failure

Relevant institutions often treat right to internet connectivity with the same disdain as they do civil and political rights.
Narrowing the gap
12 Nov, 2024

Narrowing the gap

PERHAPS a pat on the back is in order for the ECP. Together with Nadra, it has made visible efforts to reduce...
Back on their feet
12 Nov, 2024

Back on their feet

A STIRRING comeback in the series has ended Pakistan’s 22-year wait for victory against world champions Australia....