Cabinet or classroom?

Published February 12, 2022

INSPIRED as he is by his own struggles to balance academics with sporting pursuits while at school, the prime minister’s recognition of the top 10 best performing ministries might seem like a good idea, at first.

By his own admission, Imran Khan was always more interested in sports than curricular pursuits. All that changed when exam results started being announced in front of the entire student body, rather than just being handed out in envelopes. This, in the PM’s own words, was what drove him to do more homework.

What works in the schoolyard, however, won’t necessarily work in the secretariat. The PTI has always placed a premium on performance; delivering on promises was perhaps the main manifesto goal of this government. From the ‘100 Days Agenda’ to signing of performance agreements with ministers in 2020, there have been several efforts to track and evaluate the work being done by the men and women in charge. But the prime minister’s impulse to do everything publicly — noble though his intentions may be — seem to have the opposite effect from the one that was desired.

Recall that in May 2021, Mr Khan gave his ambassadors a dressing down, in full public view. At the time, this paper had held: “While the prime minister’s censure of the poor performance of some of the missions is valid and must lead to remedial action, the manner in which the no-holds-barred criticism was publicised is quite bizarre.” We stick by those words.

The managerialisaton and marketisation of the public sector — to borrow a phrase from the UK civil service lexicon — is a noble aim to pursue, but perhaps the methodology can be better fleshed out. A performance review can be most effective if the feedback is bespoke and precise. While a pat on the back from one’s prime minister before a rapturous audience may do wonders for the individual ego, it isn’t the best way to provide constructive feedback.

In fact, it may produce contempt rather than encourage competition in the top team. We had a glimpse of that during Thursday’s ceremony too, when those not included in the top 10 failed to turn up for the event — something the PM noted in his speech. Although he chided his special assistant Arbab Shahzad for ‘leaking’ the names in advance, he could not have seriously expected stalwarts like Shah Mahmood Qureshi or Fawad Chaudhry to turn up to such a ceremony and not be lauded on stage.

Perhaps it is time to channel the Imran Khan of old; he can marshal his men and women like he would urge a strike bowler in the death overs; with a few whispered tactics, a firm pat on the back and the confidence that their leader stands behind them. That kind of inspiration could be just what this government needs.

Published in Dawn, February 12th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Geopolitical games
Updated 18 Dec, 2024

Geopolitical games

While Assad may be gone — and not many are mourning the end of his brutal rule — Syria’s future does not look promising.
Polio’s toll
18 Dec, 2024

Polio’s toll

MONDAY’s attacks on polio workers in Karak and Bannu that martyred Constable Irfanullah and wounded two ...
Development expenditure
18 Dec, 2024

Development expenditure

PAKISTAN’S infrastructure development woes are wide and deep. The country must annually spend at least 10pc of its...
Risky slope
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Risky slope

Inflation likely to see an upward trajectory once high base effect tapers off.
Digital ID bill
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Digital ID bill

Without privacy safeguards, a centralised digital ID system could be misused for surveillance.
Dangerous revisionism
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Dangerous revisionism

When hatemongers call for digging up every mosque to see what lies beneath, there is a darker agenda driving matters.