IHC hints at imposing fine on PTI's Kanwal Shauzab for baseless litigation

Published March 25, 2022
A file photo of PTI MNA Kanwal Shauzab. — Photo via Radio Pakistan
A file photo of PTI MNA Kanwal Shauzab. — Photo via Radio Pakistan

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has hinted imposing a fine on a PTI lawmaker under the Cost of Litigation Act for baseless litigation after she challenged the order of a local court for registration of an FIR against her for allegedly manhandling an elderly couple.

The court was hearing a petition filed by Member National Assembly (MNA) Kanwal Shauzab. Ms Shauzab had a brawl with Mohammad Abdul Rehman and his wife Fatima Rehman over the beautification of a nullah adjacent to her house in F-11.

The lawmaker’s husband lodged a complaint against them with the cybercrime wing of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) for making a video of the beautification work and uploading it on social media.

The neighbours, on the other hand, filed a complaint in the local police, stating Ms Shauzab and her security guard manhandled them.

After the police did not register the FIR, the additional district and sessions judge ordered the registration of the case which Ms Shauzab challenged in the IHC.

During the hearing, IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah observed that the petition appeared to be a classic example of grave abuse of power by the FIA.

The dispute between Ms Shauzab and her neighbours began when the Capital Development Authority and the Metropolitan Corporation Islamabad started cleaning the area and initiating construction work on a rainwater ravine after the lawmaker shifted to her house at F-11.

After perusal of the record, the court noted that “there was admittedly an extraordinary activity by the CDA and the MCI when the MNA moved to her house in F-11.

“Both the public bodies started activities that also involved expense from the public exchequer. There was significant activity and construction work to make the rainwater ravine and the area around the house more presentable.”

The court expressed displeasure over the conduct of the MNA and noted: “It appeared that she did not realise that she was a public officeholder and not an ordinary citizen.”

The court order stated that “in order to ensure fairness, transparency and to meet the ends of justice, the court appoints Asad Umer, minister for planning, and Senator Syed Ali Zafar advocate as amici curiae to assist the court. They shall also assist the court as to why the application filed by Ms Shauzab may not be allowed by ordering payment of exemplary costs to the two senior citizens who were subjected to abuse of powers by the FIA.”

The investigating officer and the director cybercrime FIA were also put on notice to explain why they may also not be ordered to pay exemplary costs.

The court put the elderly neighbours of the lawmaker on notice telling them that they “will be at liberty to file their affidavit of costs under the Cost of Litigation Act 2017.”

Published in Dawn, March 25th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Battling hate
Updated 15 Mar, 2026

Battling hate

In the current scenario, geopolitical conflict, racial prejudice and religious bigotry all contribute to the threats Muslims face.
TB drugs shortage
15 Mar, 2026

TB drugs shortage

‘CRIMINAL negligence’ is the phrase that jumps to mind when one considers the disturbing consequences of the...
Chinese diplomacy
Updated 14 Mar, 2026

Chinese diplomacy

THERE are signs that China is taking a more active role in trying to resolve the issue of cross-border terrorism...
Fragile gains at risk
14 Mar, 2026

Fragile gains at risk

PAKISTAN is confronting an external shock stemming from the US-Israel war on Iran that few of the other affected...
Kidney disease
14 Mar, 2026

Kidney disease

ON World Kidney Day this past Thursday, the Pakistan Medical Association raised the alarm on Pakistan’s...
Delicate balance
Updated 13 Mar, 2026

Delicate balance

PAKISTAN has to maintain a delicate balance where the geopolitics of the US-Israeli aggression against Iran are...