ISLAMABAD: In a significant move, the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on Wednesday directed its staff to list the “foreign funding” case against the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf as “prohibited funding” from now on.

The development came after Chief Election Commissioner Sikandar Sultan Raja, who was heading an ECP bench hearing the case, agreed with PTI lawyer Anwar Mansoor Khan’s stance that the case should be listed as prohibited funding, and not foreign funding.

The CEC, however, pointed out that the PTI itself had been using the term foreign funding for the case. “Your clients have been using the term ‘foreign funding’ on media,” Mr Raja told the PTI’s counsel.

Anwar Khan, while concluding his arguments in the case, said the Elections Act 2017 allowed receiving funds from overseas Pakistanis, but prohibited procuring funds from anyone else other than them.

“Branding the case as foreign funding is a misnomer. The correct name should be prohibited funding case,” he argued.

However, Syed Ahmad Hassan Shah, the counsel for petitioner Akbar S. Babar, contended that the PPO 2002 clearly classified a party funded by foreigners or foreign companies as a “foreign-aided political party”. Even the terms of reference of the ECP scrutiny committee mentioned it as “PTI foreign funding case”, he said.

Speaking about the scrutiny committee’s report that revealed account details of the PTI, Anwar Khan said he would not say that the committee had “mala fide” intentions.

“Even if there was illicit funding in the party’s accounts, it has been returned. The [management] of the funds is given to a policy agent. If funding is received from sources other than the ones mentioned in the agreement, then it is the responsibility of the agent,” he explained. “Maybe the committee probing the accounts did not have the required knowledge about the matter.”

At the conclusion, the PTI lawyer thanked the CEC and other members of the ECP for their patient hearing and allowing him a full opportunity to present his arguments.

The case was adjourned till June 20 when Ahmad Hassan Shah would counter the final arguments of PTI’s lawyer.

Published in Dawn, June 16th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Kurram atrocity
Updated 22 Nov, 2024

Kurram atrocity

It would be a monumental mistake for the state to continue ignoring the violence in Kurram.
Persistent grip
22 Nov, 2024

Persistent grip

PAKISTAN has now registered 50 polio cases this year. We all saw it coming and yet there was nothing we could do to...
Green transport
22 Nov, 2024

Green transport

THE government has taken a commendable step by announcing a New Energy Vehicle policy aiming to ensure that by 2030,...
Military option
Updated 21 Nov, 2024

Military option

While restoring peace is essential, addressing Balochistan’s socioeconomic deprivation is equally important.
HIV/AIDS disaster
21 Nov, 2024

HIV/AIDS disaster

A TORTUROUS sense of déjà vu is attached to the latest health fiasco at Multan’s Nishtar Hospital. The largest...
Dubious pardon
21 Nov, 2024

Dubious pardon

IT is disturbing how a crime as grave as custodial death has culminated in an out-of-court ‘settlement’. The...