ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Shezan Services, makers of the popular jams and jellies carrying the name, in a trademark dispute which began in 1988 after another firm applied for permission to use the brand for its bakery products.

A two-judge bench, consisting of Justice Qazi Faez Isa and Justice Yahya Afridi, on Friday disposed of an appeal moved by Shezan Services (Pvt) Ltd against Shezan Bakers and Confectioners (Pvt) Ltd — owners of a chain of restaurants and bakeries in Lahore.

The apex court had, on Feb 10, reserved its ruling on a petition brought by Shezan Services, which was represented by Sultan Ahmed Sheikh.

Hasan Irfan Khan appeared on behalf of the respondent — Shezan Bakers and Confectioners.

The legal dispute stretches back over 33 years to Dec 29, 1988, when Shezan Bakers filed an application with the Registrar of Trade Marks seeking registration of the trademark ‘Shezan’ in their name. The firm intended to use the name for its patties, cheese straw, chicken sandwiches, chicken spring rolls and a number of other items.

The application was eventually published in the Trade Marks Journal.

The registrar advertised the application in the journal for the purpose of inviting opposition. Shezan Services did so under the Trade Marks Act of 1940.

Authored by Justice Qazi Faez Isa, a 10-page judgement accepted the appeal and set aside a May 14, 2018, Sindh High Court (SHC) order which rejected the plea with an observation had it been the case of permissive use only, the appellant would have claimed a royalty for continuous use of the word “trademark.”

The apex court judgement was clear in declaring that Shezan Bakers and Confectioners was not the proprietor of the word ‘Shezan’ and had not registered the trademark Shezan.

Instead, Shahnawaz Limited was the proprietor of the label ‘Shezan’ and the first to have registered the name on Sept 30, 1958 — 30 years before the respondent applied for registration, the order said.

The trademark Shezan is being held by the appellant (Shezan Services) since Sept 30, 1958. There was a distinctiveness in the trademark, the bench observed.

Shezan Services had contended that the trademark Shezan was their house mark since the entity was an internationally known maker of jams and jellies.

The company is also the proprietor of several hundred trademarks registered in Pakistan. Some of them are even registered abroad.

The word Shezan, as well as the label, had been duly registered in respect of jams, marmalades and jellies, the company argued.

The trademark Shezan was originally registered in the name of Shahnawaz Ltd, but that company assigned this trademark, subsequently, in favour of Shezan International.

The petitioner further contended that due to continuous and extensive use under the label of Shezan, it has become very popular in the country.

The company accused Shezan Bakers of imitating the trademark Shezan for their bakery and confectionery products.

In their turn, Shezan Bakers furnished the copy of an agreement dated Feb 19, 1975. The petitioner objected that the agreement had been executed by a third party.

Furthermore, Shezan Services argued, permission was granted to Shezan Bakers for running two restaurants in Lahore, namely Oriental Restaurant and Continental Restaurant.

The agreement did not confer any right to the bakers, the petitioner added.

Published in Dawn, June 18th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Bilateral progress
Updated 18 Oct, 2024

Bilateral progress

Dialogue with India should be uninterruptible and should cover all sticking points standing in the way of better ties.
Bracing for impact
18 Oct, 2024

Bracing for impact

CLIMATE change is here to stay. As Pakistan confronts serious structural imbalances, recurring natural calamities ...
Unfair burden
18 Oct, 2024

Unfair burden

THINGS are improving, or so we have been told. Where this statement applies to macroeconomic indicators, it can be...
Successful summit
Updated 17 Oct, 2024

Successful summit

Platforms like SCO present an opportunity for states to set aside narrow differences.
Failed tax target
17 Oct, 2024

Failed tax target

THE government’s plan to document retailers for tax purposes through its ‘voluntary’ Tajir Dost Scheme appears...
More questions
17 Oct, 2024

More questions

THE alleged rape of a student at a private college in Lahore has sparked confusion, social media campaigns, ...