THE political parties these days are busy claiming to be behind the self-proclaimed ‘victory’ over the mere acknowledgement by Financial Action Task Force (FATF) President Dr Marcus Pleyer that Pakistan has met all 34 conditions on two separate action plans. This is despite the fact that the ‘watchdog’ is yet to take Pakistan off its so-called grey list, and will now schedule an on-site visit for verification of the country’s money-laundering and counterterrorism financing mechanism.

Pleyer did not mince words and was pretty clear when he said Pakistan was not being removed from the ‘grey list, and it would have to ensure during the FATF visit that it has effectively tackled relevant issues.

What bothers the mind is that no country or individual can actually indulge in money-laundering without there being someone at the ‘other end’. We have seen billions of dollars being invested in London’s property market which caused quite a stir in the British financial circles. The FATF has callously closed its eyes over the United Kingdom, which was the recipient country. Why?

It is common knowledge that the CIA had flooded Pakistan with legal/illegal dollars during the Soviet-Afghan war. As soon as Soviet army retreated from Afghanistan, the Americans also left the war-ravaged, landlocked country in a precarious situation, leaving Pakistan behind to manage a multitude of problems alone.

In a geopolitical summersault, the United States changed the definition of ‘mujahideen’ and declared them ‘terrorists’; the very people who were once invited to the White House by the American president during the Cold War.

This was the time when the US-UK-India nexus started strangulating Pakistan on one pretext or the other. The so-called global watchdogs and international organisations, such as the FATF, the World Trade Organisation (WTO), the World Bank (WB), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), are nothing but tools in the hands of those who actually rule the world. They use these tools to bring strategically important countries to their knees.

It is a known fact that FATF has let many countries go off the hook, although they had done far less to reform their financial regimes. Why?

Although FATF has conceded that Pakistan has met all conditions, it is too early to celebrate anything, for there is always a chance that the country might remain under intense monitoring. This is obviously because such watchdogs are there only for putting pressure through various tactics on countries that are not submissive or are considered a threat to the cabal’s interests.

Abid Mahmud Ansari
Islamabad

Published in Dawn, June 23rd, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

A hasty retreat
Updated 28 Nov, 2024

A hasty retreat

Govt should not extend its campaign of violence against PTI and its leaders, thinking it now has the upper hand. Enough is enough.
Lebanon truce
28 Nov, 2024

Lebanon truce

WILL it hold? That is the question many in the Middle East and beyond will be asking after a 60-day ceasefire ...
MDR anomaly removed
28 Nov, 2024

MDR anomaly removed

THE State Bank’s decision to remove its minimum deposit rate requirement for conventional banks on deposits from...
Islamabad march
Updated 27 Nov, 2024

Islamabad march

WITH emotions running high, chaos closes in. As these words were being written, rumours and speculation were all...
Policing the internet
27 Nov, 2024

Policing the internet

IT is chilling to witness how Pakistan — a nation that embraced the freedoms of modern democracy, and the tech ...
Correcting sports priorities
27 Nov, 2024

Correcting sports priorities

IT has been a lingering battle that has cast a shadow over sports in Pakistan: who are the national sports...