ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court, o Thursday, will resume the hearing of Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) chairman Imran Khan’s challenge to the recent amendments to National Accountability Bureau (NAB) ordinance, a day after an amended petition was filed in the matter on behalf of the ex-premier.

A three-member SC bench, headed by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial and comprising Justice Ijazul Ahsan and Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, will take up the matter after Advocate Khawaja Haris Ahmed, counsel for the PTI chief, filed the amended petition that laid emphasis on the alleged violation of fundamental rights as a result of the legislation.

In the amended petition, the petitioner has included the challenge to second amendment to the law done by the coalition government on Aug 16 in which offences involving misappropriation of less than Rs500 million were taken out of the purview of the law.

Moreover, absconders who were punished under Section 31 of the ordinance in absentia were also taken out.

Amended petition targets Aug 16 legislation on offences involving misappropriation of less than half a billion rupees

The petition stated that most of the changes were ‘person specific’.

The petitioner pleaded that it would be just and fair in protecting the constitutional and fundamental rights of the citizens that NAB should be asked to provide details of all cases, which relate to prominent and influential holders of public office, especially regarding cases pertaining to offences of owning assets (movable and immovable) beyond known sources of income and misuse of authority.

However, the petitioner feared, the recent amendments operated to preemptively exonerate public office holders or their co-conspirators from offences of corruption.

The petition claimed the amendments were also ultra vires of the fundamental rights guaranteed to people in articles 9, 14, 18, 24 and 25 of the Constitution.

Senior counsel Makhdoom Ali Khan, who represented the federal government, has already furnished a concise statement in the case, which had been filed in June.

According to the statement, the forum to enact or oppose the enactment of statutes was Parliament.

Politicians might succeed or fail in the Parliament in pursuit of their objectives and those frustrated in their endeavours could take their appeal to the people, the statement pointed out.

However, the remedy for grievances of such politicians was not with the courts of law, it added.

Published in Dawn, September 1st, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Smog hazard
Updated 05 Nov, 2024

Smog hazard

The catastrophe unfolding in Lahore is a product of authorities’ repeated failure to recognise environmental impact of rapid urbanisation.
Monetary policy
05 Nov, 2024

Monetary policy

IN an aggressive move, the State Bank on Monday reduced its key policy rate by a hefty 250bps to 15pc. This is the...
Cultural power
05 Nov, 2024

Cultural power

AS vital modes of communication, art and culture have the power to overcome social and international barriers....
Disregarding CCI
Updated 04 Nov, 2024

Disregarding CCI

The failure to regularly convene CCI meetings means that the process of democratic decision-making is falling apart.
Defeating TB
04 Nov, 2024

Defeating TB

CONSIDERING the fact that Pakistan has the fifth highest burden of tuberculosis in the world as per the World Health...
Ceasefire charade
Updated 04 Nov, 2024

Ceasefire charade

The US talks of peace, while simultaneously arming and funding their Israeli allies, are doomed to fail, and are little more than a charade.