LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Friday issued notices to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) and other respondents on a petition of an overseas Pakistani woman challenging a report of the commission’s scrutiny committee in the case of ‘prohibited’ funding against Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI), allegedly showing the petitioner as a foreigner.

Benish Faridi, who lives in the United Kingdom, filed the petition through her special attorney and also challenged the ECP decision against the PTI in the “foreign funding case”.

Advocate Azhar Siddique appeared on behalf of the petitioner and stated before the court that the scrutiny report on “Foreign National Donor” incorrectly determined the nationality of the overseas Pakistanis.

He said a large number of citizens of Pakistan and those living abroad came forward on social media

refuting their status as a foreign national donor. He said neither the scrutiny committee nor the ECP had ever verified the information during the course of the proceedings against the PTI.

The counsel argued that the scrutiny committee and the ECP also committed a violation of law by seeking personal information from the National Database and Registration Authority (Nadra) regarding the overseas Pakistanis and blindly relying on such data without any verification.

He said being a member of a political party, every citizen had a constitutionally guaranteed right to participate in a permissible political activity and electoral process in order to elect his/her representatives democratically.

The lawyer submitted that the ECP erred in understanding the status of various organisations and politically victimised the PTI, its members and supporters.

He said the ECP incorrectly concluded that PTI-UK was a public limited company and that it was not permitted under the UK laws to collect political donations and that Pakistan laws did not permit any type of funding by an overseas incorporated company.

He asked the court to set aside the proceedings of the ECP and its scrutiny committee for being in violation of the fundamental rights of the citizens.

Justice Shahid Karim issued notices to the ECP and other respondents for submission of replies and also sought assistance from the attorney general on the next hearing.

Published in Dawn, September 10th, 2022

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...