Imran ‘abandons’ designs to sway chief’s selection

Published November 9, 2022
PTI chief Imran Khan speaks during an interview with TRT World. — Screengrab via TRT Twitter
PTI chief Imran Khan speaks during an interview with TRT World. — Screengrab via TRT Twitter

• Says relations with military soured on question of ‘accountability’
• Wants CJP to be more ‘assertive’ in dispensing justice
• Claims forensic report will ‘prove’ there was more than one shooter in Wazirabad

LAHORE: After repeatedly calling for a consultative process before picking the new army chief, ousted prime minister Imran Khan now does not see any problem if the appointment is made by the Shehbaz Sharif government.

In an interaction with journalists at his Zaman Park residence on Tuesday, the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) chairman offered a fresh take on the issue of appointing a new chief of army staff.

When asked whether he had demanded that the appointment of a new chief be made in consultation with him and/or his party, Mr Khan said: “No… they can appoint whoever they want.”

Earlier, in several public meetings and remarks made over the course of the past sev­eral months, Mr Khan had declared that “the Sha­rifs and the Zardaris” were unfit to make the appointment to the top military slot on the basis that “thieves cannot be allowed to appoint the next army chief”.

But when a journalist asked Mr Khan on Tuesday whether incumbent army chief Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa was being given an extension, the former premier responded with: “This is a billion-dollar question.”

Editorial: Chief concern

Mr Khan also revealed that his relations with the military establishment became strained on the issue of “accountability”, adding that the premier should be empowered if the country was to run smoothly.

“I had no issue with the army. Problems only cropped up on accountability matters. However, the army can play a positive role. I believe if the country is to run smoothly, then the prime minister should also be given power along with the management,” Mr Khan said.

He was of the opinion that a coalition government had to make many compromises. “The prime minister can be blackmailed in a coalition... a two-third majority gives strength to the premier,” he maintained.

Talking to Dawn, a senior PTI leader also confirmed the impression that relations between Mr Khan and the military leadership soured during the PTI government when the latter advised the PM to shift focus from accountability of opposition leaders to fixing the economy. “Not budging from his stance, Imran Khan invited trouble,” he said.

‘Farcical FIR’

Mr Khan was not happy over the FIR registered over the attempt on his life, as it did not name any of suspects he had nominated.

“On the issue of the farcical FIR, my lawyers will give my position,” Mr Khan said in a tweet.

He told journalists he would challenge the FIR in the court to get the three persons – Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif, Interior Minister Rana Sanaullah and ISI Counter Intelligence Wing head Maj-Gen Faisal Naseer – nominated in the case. But, if an investigation proves their innocence, he said, their names should be struck off the FIR. He also claimed that the statement given by the shooting suspect, Naveed Ahmad, was a lie, adding that he had asked the Punjab government to ‘protect’ Ahmad while he is in police custody.”

Editorial: Imran's claim about a mole inside the intelligence apparatus is a grave misstep and must be probed

Separately, in an interview with TRT World, Imran Khan called on the chief justice of Pakistan to be “more assertive” when it comes to dispensing justice.

“Justice persists when every person, even the most powerful, is brought under the rule of law. I, as the head of a province, can’t get the three people to be investigated, imagine what the situation will be for the common man,” he said, adding that PTI’s movement for “real struggle” demanded rule of law.”

He also said that he would receive the forensic report of the Wazirabad attack on Tuesday night, which would prove that “there was more than one shooter”.

Published in Dawn, November 9th, 2022

Opinion

Revival? For whom?

Revival? For whom?

Numerous sets of numbers, not quoted by govt sources, suggest that things are not as dazzling as claimed by those who run the country.

Editorial

Premature alarm
Updated 20 Feb, 2025

Premature alarm

Improvement in headline inflation gives policymakers chance to fix investment policies, implement structural reforms.
Forsaken province
20 Feb, 2025

Forsaken province

AND the endless cycle of violence continues. The brutal killing on Tuesday night of seven Punjab-bound passengers in...
In poor health
20 Feb, 2025

In poor health

THE absence of decent and affordable healthcare in the country continues to ruin lives. An example of this is ...
Out of control
Updated 19 Feb, 2025

Out of control

AS bodies continue to fall in Kurram despite a state-sanctioned ceasefire, one wonders how long local militants’...
Hollow words
19 Feb, 2025

Hollow words

IT is not uncommon for politicians to resort to the use of hyperbole in order to boost their public standing. ...
Migration matters
19 Feb, 2025

Migration matters

THE grass, it seems, did appear greener on the other side to millions of people as evidenced by the latest UN ...