ISLAMABAD: The Isla­mabad High Court (IHC) on Thursday dismissed a petition seeking disqualification of former prime minister Imran Khan for not ‘revealing’ that he had allegedly fathered an “illegitimate daughter”.

The court also issued detailed verdicts on petitions seeking disqualification of former president Asif Ali Zardari and former federal minister Fawad Chaudhry, observing that such matters were “a waste of litigants’ time and diminish public confidence in their elected representatives”.

In its observations on the petition against Imran Khan, an IHC division bench said the allegation that the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf chairman “concealed his daughter” was a matter of “private life”.

The bench comprised outgoing Chief Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb. “Moreover, the rights of a child, named in the petition, are also involved. Her rights may irretrievably be harmed if this court undertakes the probe,” observed the court.

“The likely consequences relating to the rights of the child are a sufficient ground for refusing to exercise the extraordinary jurisdiction vested in this court under Article 199 of the Constitution.

“We feel that it is not in public interest to entertain the petition in hand, let alone ordering investigations related to the private life of the respondent” [Imran Khan],” the bench opined.

It concluded that entertaining such petitions would lead to prejudicing the rights of litigants since the courts were already facing a backlog.

‘Sadiq’ and ‘Ameen’

In his judgement on the petition seeking disqualification of Asif Zardari and Fawad Chaudhry, Justice Minallah held that any error in an elected representative’s disqualification judgement caused irreparable harm.

The judge observed that the standard of ‘Sadiq’ and ‘Ameen’ did not exist for any office-holder other than elected representatives.

This standard did not exist even for “unelected individuals” who have ruled the country for over half of its existence, the judge added.

Justice Minallah said the effects of disqualification under Article 62 (1)(f) were profound. “Parlia­m­e­­nt could create its own me­­chanism for accountability of parliamentarians.” He was of the view that investigations against elected representative damaged their reputation even if they were declared innocent later. “It benefits their political rivals.”

Justice Minallah held that voters should be empowered to decide who will represent them and their votes should be taken as a yardstick for judging an individual’s honesty and sagacity. The outgoing IHC chief justice stated that a parliamentarian who had secured 200,000 votes should not be disqualified by an unelected judge.

“In the public interest, courts should not be inv­olved in cases of disqualification of elected representatives,” he added.

Published in Dawn, November 11th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

A hasty retreat
Updated 28 Nov, 2024

A hasty retreat

Govt should not extend its campaign of violence against PTI and its leaders, thinking it now has the upper hand. Enough is enough.
Lebanon truce
28 Nov, 2024

Lebanon truce

WILL it hold? That is the question many in the Middle East and beyond will be asking after a 60-day ceasefire ...
MDR anomaly removed
28 Nov, 2024

MDR anomaly removed

THE State Bank’s decision to remove its minimum deposit rate requirement for conventional banks on deposits from...
Islamabad march
Updated 27 Nov, 2024

Islamabad march

WITH emotions running high, chaos closes in. As these words were being written, rumours and speculation were all...
Policing the internet
27 Nov, 2024

Policing the internet

IT is chilling to witness how Pakistan — a nation that embraced the freedoms of modern democracy, and the tech ...
Correcting sports priorities
27 Nov, 2024

Correcting sports priorities

IT has been a lingering battle that has cast a shadow over sports in Pakistan: who are the national sports...