Xi-Biden summit

Published November 17, 2022

THE recent one-on-one meeting between Xi Jinping and Joe Biden on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Bali reinforces the role personalised communication at the top level plays in global diplomacy. Though the Chinese and American leaders did not make any breakthroughs, the meeting did result in a significant climb-down in rhetoric from both sides. There were smiles and handshakes, as opposed to the combative rhetoric that had of recent been emanating from both capitals. However, though the high-level contact was positive, there should be no illusions about the trajectory the relationship between the world’s two top economies is taking: it is one of intense competition. The challenge before both is to manage this competition, and prevent it from escalating into confrontation. If the spirit on display in Bali is replicated, the status quo can be maintained. It was reassuring that Mr Biden said he was not interested in a new Cold War with China, while Mr Xi also struck a conciliatory tone when he observed that there was a need to “elevate the relationship”. Yet, there was also frank discussion about the respective red lines, with the Chinese leader stressing that Taiwan was “the first red line that must not be crossed”, while the US president was critical of China’s “aggressive actions towards Taiwan”. The mutual affirmation against the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine was also welcome.

From here, both sides need to continue their cautious engagement. The US should not fan Taiwanese independence aspirations, which will surely enflame nationalist sentiment in China, while Beijing must seek to resolve the Taiwan question peacefully. It is highly unlikely that an age of Sino-US bonhomie is on the horizon, with the Pentagon saying in its recent National Defence Strategy that China remains America’s most “consequential strategic competitor”. In order to keep this competition within manageable limits, both sides will have to make compromises and respect each other’s red lines, or else the unintended consequences of brinksmanship will have devastating effects on the global order.

Published in Dawn, November 17th, 2022

Opinion

From hard to harder

From hard to harder

Instead of ‘hard state’ turning even harder, citizens deserve a state that goes soft on them in delivering democratic and development aspirations.

Editorial

Canal unrest
Updated 03 Apr, 2025

Canal unrest

With rising water scarcity in Indus system, it is crucial to move towards a consensus-driven policymaking process.
Iran-US tension
03 Apr, 2025

Iran-US tension

THE Trump administration’s threats aimed at Iran do not bode well for global peace, and unless Washington changes...
Flights to history
03 Apr, 2025

Flights to history

MOHENJODARO could have been the forgotten gold we desperately need. Instead, this 5,000-year-old well of antiquity ...
Eid amidst crises
Updated 31 Mar, 2025

Eid amidst crises

Until the Muslim world takes practical steps to end these atrocities, these besieged populations will see no joy.
Women’s rights
Updated 01 Apr, 2025

Women’s rights

Such judgements, and others directly impacting women’s rights should be given more airtime in media.
Not helping
Updated 02 Apr, 2025

Not helping

If it's committed to peace in Balochistan, the state must draw a line between militancy and legitimate protest.