LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Monday disposed of a petition seeking restraining order against the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) long march with a direction to police to hear aggrieved traders and decide the matter within a week, while a sessions court rejected another plea challenging police refusal to book PTI Chairman Imran Khan for sedition.

Naeem Mir, the chairman of the supreme council of the All Pakistan Traders Association, filed the petition seeking a restraining order.

A law officer of the federal government apprised the LHC that the Supreme Court disposed of an identical petition, while a few others were also pending before the Islamabad High Court and Lahore High Court’s Rawalpindi bench.

At this, Justice Jawad Hassan disposed of the petition and directed the additional inspector general of police to hear the grievance of the petitioner and decide the matter within one week.

Previously, the judge had turned down the petitioner’s request to pass an immediate restraining order against the long march.

The petitioner, through his counsel, submitted that the respondents should take steps for improvement of the law and order and arrange an open place outside the cities for lawful demonstrations, protests or processions by the political parties, till a final decision of this petition.

He said the PTI workers blocked entrance and exit points on the motorways and other main roads.

Also, a sessions court dismissed a petition challenging police refusal to register a case against ex-premier Imran Khan on a charge of ridiculing the institution of army in a recent public rally in Faisalabad.

The decision on the petition filed by one Sheikh Muzaffar Hussain, under Section 22-A and 22-B of CrPC was earlier reserved.

Additional district and sessions judge Ghulam Hussain Bhinder while pronouncing the verdict dismissed the petition in light of a report filed by SP investigation/additional district complaint officer. The report said the petition was baseless and no cognizable offence was made out against the respondent.

The petitioner through a counsel contended that he filed an application with Samanabad police for the registration of a criminal case against PTI chief for scandalising senior officers of Pakistan army. He alleged Khan through his scandalous statement attempted to create rift among army officers and tried to portray them less patriotic. The counsel said the act amounted to the offence of sedition under the law, liable to be prosecuted following registration of a case.

He asked the court to order the police to register a case against Khan under the relevant provisions of the Pakistan Penal Code.

Published in Dawn, November 22nd, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

United stance
Updated 13 Nov, 2024

United stance

It would've been better if the OIC-Arab League summit had announced practical measures to punish Israel.
Unscheduled visit
13 Nov, 2024

Unscheduled visit

Unusual IMF visit shows the lender will closely watch implementation of programme goals to prevent it from derailing.
Bara’s businesswomen
13 Nov, 2024

Bara’s businesswomen

Bara’s brave women have proven that with the right support, societal barriers can be overcome.
System failure
Updated 12 Nov, 2024

System failure

Relevant institutions often treat right to internet connectivity with the same disdain as they do civil and political rights.
Narrowing the gap
12 Nov, 2024

Narrowing the gap

PERHAPS a pat on the back is in order for the ECP. Together with Nadra, it has made visible efforts to reduce...
Back on their feet
12 Nov, 2024

Back on their feet

A STIRRING comeback in the series has ended Pakistan’s 22-year wait for victory against world champions Australia....