Misuse of power

Published December 19, 2022

THIS is with reference to the report “Cops suspended for ‘stopping judge from using foggy motorway’” (Dec 1). Lawyers, judges and law-enforcers (police) are expected to be more law-abiding than the common man. This puts more responsibility on them to be role models for all citizens.

However, according to the news, an anti-terrorism court judge not only violated the law blatantly, but showed arrogance and highhandedness when confronted by law-enforcement officials.

The judge, along with his police squad, crossed the barrier forcibly at Muridke interchange to get on to the Sialkot-Lahore Motorway, which was closed for traffic owing to fog.

Two officials of the National Highways and Motorway Police (NHMP) stopped the judge at the next interchange and challaned him for crossing and entering the closed motorway.

Instead of apologising and admitting his mistake, according to the said report, the judge threatened the two officials that he would hold “the court on the motorway and start proceedings against the patrolling officers under terrorism sections for stopping him”.

No doubt, vehicles that perform emergency duties, like police, judges, ambulances and fire brigade can jump red light, overspeed or use the wrong lane in an emergency situation, but when a road is closed due to fog, one can only endanger one’s own life and that of the others.

To make matters worse, the judge wilfully disobeyed the law-enforcers and threatened them with action under terrorism charges. Such an action cannot be justified.

Under section 81(c) of The National Highways Safety Ordinance, 2000, police officials are also empowered to arrest any person who wilfully disobey or obstruct any lawful order. On the contrary, the two police officials were suspended for performing their duty as per orders.

This incident is a perfect example of arrogance, misuse of public office and abuse of power.

The higher judiciary needs to conduct an impartial inquiry into the matter.

Saira Ahmad
Toba Tek Singh

Published in Dawn, December 19th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Online oppression
Updated 04 Dec, 2024

Online oppression

Plan to bring changes to Peca is simply another attempt to suffocate dissent. It shows how the state continues to prioritise control over real cybersecurity concerns.
The right call
04 Dec, 2024

The right call

AMIDST the ongoing tussle between the federal government and the main opposition party, several critical issues...
Acting cautiously
04 Dec, 2024

Acting cautiously

IT appears too big a temptation to ignore. The wider expectations for a steeper reduction in the borrowing costs...
Competing narratives
03 Dec, 2024

Competing narratives

Rather than hunting keyboard warriors, it would be better to support a transparent probe into reported deaths during PTI protest.
Early retirement
03 Dec, 2024

Early retirement

THE government is reportedly considering a proposal to reduce the average age of superannuation by five years to 55...
Being differently abled
03 Dec, 2024

Being differently abled

A SOCIETY comes of age when it does not normalise ‘othering’. As we observe the International Day of Persons ...