ISLAMABAD: The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on Tuesday reserved its judgement on a PTI application seeking cross-examination of witnesses in the prohibited funding case.

The plea was filed during the hearing of a show-cause notice issued to the PTI after the ECP order of Aug 2.

PTI lawyer Anwar Mansoor Khan urged the ECP to allow him to cross-examine witnesses, including the bank managers who furnished PTI’s bank statements on the instructions of the State Bank of Pakistan.

IHC asks the party to prove its petition is not premature

“The bank managers should be asked how they prepared the PTI bank statements, and how these bank statements were received from the State Bank of Pakistan,” the PTI lawyer contended.

“The ECP has the power to requisition any individual,” he said.

The PTI lawyer had challenged the show-cause notice and termed it illegal.

The ECP’s legal representative stated that the process of investigations had been completed and the PTI was part of it before the scrutiny committee for four years and before the ECP for eight years and not once it had demanded cross-examination of the witnesses.

After hearing the two sides, the ECP reserved the judgement on the petition that will be announced later.

IHC hearing

The Islamabad High Court on Tuesday asked the counsel for the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf to prove that the petition, requesting the IHC to set aside the ECP’s report on prohibited funding and to restrain the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) from conducting inquiries into the case, is not premature.

An IHC larger bench comprising Chief Justice Aamer Farooq, Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb and Justice Babar Sattar was hearing the PTI’s petition filed against the ECP report on the prohibited funding case.

Anwar Mansoor Khan, the counsel for PTI, argued before the court that the federal government, while acting on the ECP’s report, issued direction to the FIA to conduct inquiries into alleged prohibi-ted funding.

He said the FIA had initiated 185 inquiries across the country against the PTI leadership in connection with prohibited funding.

Justice Farooq asked the PTI counsel to conclude the arguments as early as possible, observing that the lawyer had taken too much time to come to the point and with such slow pace the hearing would likely to conclude by June next year.

The bench advised the counsel to take a couple of hours to conclude the arguments and adjourned the hearing till Jan 10, 2023.

Published in Dawn, December 21st, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Kurram atrocity
Updated 22 Nov, 2024

Kurram atrocity

It would be a monumental mistake for the state to continue ignoring the violence in Kurram.
Persistent grip
22 Nov, 2024

Persistent grip

An audit of polio funds at federal and provincial levels is sorely needed, with obstacles hindering eradication efforts targeted.
Green transport
22 Nov, 2024

Green transport

THE government has taken a commendable step by announcing a New Energy Vehicle policy aiming to ensure that by 2030,...
Military option
Updated 21 Nov, 2024

Military option

While restoring peace is essential, addressing Balochistan’s socioeconomic deprivation is equally important.
HIV/AIDS disaster
21 Nov, 2024

HIV/AIDS disaster

A TORTUROUS sense of déjà vu is attached to the latest health fiasco at Multan’s Nishtar Hospital. The largest...
Dubious pardon
21 Nov, 2024

Dubious pardon

IT is disturbing how a crime as grave as custodial death has culminated in an out-of-court ‘settlement’. The...