ISLAMABAD: The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on Tuesday reserved its judgement on a PTI application seeking cross-examination of witnesses in the prohibited funding case.

The plea was filed during the hearing of a show-cause notice issued to the PTI after the ECP order of Aug 2.

PTI lawyer Anwar Mansoor Khan urged the ECP to allow him to cross-examine witnesses, including the bank managers who furnished PTI’s bank statements on the instructions of the State Bank of Pakistan.

IHC asks the party to prove its petition is not premature

“The bank managers should be asked how they prepared the PTI bank statements, and how these bank statements were received from the State Bank of Pakistan,” the PTI lawyer contended.

“The ECP has the power to requisition any individual,” he said.

The PTI lawyer had challenged the show-cause notice and termed it illegal.

The ECP’s legal representative stated that the process of investigations had been completed and the PTI was part of it before the scrutiny committee for four years and before the ECP for eight years and not once it had demanded cross-examination of the witnesses.

After hearing the two sides, the ECP reserved the judgement on the petition that will be announced later.

IHC hearing

The Islamabad High Court on Tuesday asked the counsel for the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf to prove that the petition, requesting the IHC to set aside the ECP’s report on prohibited funding and to restrain the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) from conducting inquiries into the case, is not premature.

An IHC larger bench comprising Chief Justice Aamer Farooq, Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb and Justice Babar Sattar was hearing the PTI’s petition filed against the ECP report on the prohibited funding case.

Anwar Mansoor Khan, the counsel for PTI, argued before the court that the federal government, while acting on the ECP’s report, issued direction to the FIA to conduct inquiries into alleged prohibi-ted funding.

He said the FIA had initiated 185 inquiries across the country against the PTI leadership in connection with prohibited funding.

Justice Farooq asked the PTI counsel to conclude the arguments as early as possible, observing that the lawyer had taken too much time to come to the point and with such slow pace the hearing would likely to conclude by June next year.

The bench advised the counsel to take a couple of hours to conclude the arguments and adjourned the hearing till Jan 10, 2023.

Published in Dawn, December 21st, 2022

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...