ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has stopped civil judges in Sindh from heading committees formed to oversee flood relief efforts and said vulnerable groups, particularly women, should be given the job.

The citizen committees were constituted in September on the directions of Sindh High Court’s (SHC) Sukkur and Larkana circuit benches in every taluka of Sukkur, Larkana and Shaheed Benazirabad divisions and Naushero Feroze district.

The high court had directed that a civil judge will head the committees and work under the supervision of the concerned district and sessions judge.

Sindh’s Provincial Disaster Mana­g­e­ment Authority (PDMA) director general and other government departm­e­nts moved the Supreme Court against the SHC’s order.

Court stops civil judges from heading such panels

A three-judge bench, including Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Ayesha Malik and Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, took up the petitions filed by the officials.

The verdict, authored by Justice Malik, clarified the committees themselves will not engage in directing or controlling the relief work.

Instead, they will participate in the process put in place by the District Di­­saster Management Authority (DDMA) to make it more effective and inclusive.

She emphasised that as per the National Policy Guideline on Vulner­able Groups in Disasters, 2014, the participation of women was required in disaster management plans at all levels to ensure the integration of gender perspectives.

As per the policy, women were at greater risk from natural disasters than men, the judgement said, adding they were vulnerable victims in natural disasters and also play a significant role thr­oughout the disaster management cyc­­le, without being adequately recognised and included in the decision-making.

The judgement observed that policy guidelines also defined women, child­ren, older persons and persons with disabilities as vulnerable groups in disaster.

The National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) and National Disaster Risk Reduction Policy also emphasised reducing the risks and vulnerabilities of those who were marginalised, the judgement noted.

The affected areas always require maternity and healthcare for women therefore there was an increased need for female doctors, trainers and caretakers to attend to the health concerns, the verdict remarked.

Women are also subjected to gender-based violence and harassment in times of such calamities, therefore safety and security concerns were also of significance for which appropriate response was required.

Justice Malik directed that the committees should comprise medical superintendents of the taluka hospitals, mukhtiarkars (attorneys), PDMA’s focal person and the president of the respective taluka bar association.

In his additional note, Justice Shah emphasised the need for a climate-resilient adaptation plan and a detailed mechanism for the utilisation of funds given to Pakistan.

Published in Dawn, January 22nd, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Strange claim
Updated 21 Dec, 2024

Strange claim

In all likelihood, Pakistan and US will continue to be ‘frenemies'.
Media strangulation
Updated 21 Dec, 2024

Media strangulation

Administration must decide whether it wishes to be remembered as an enabler or an executioner of press freedom.
Israeli rampage
21 Dec, 2024

Israeli rampage

ALONG with the genocide in Gaza, Israel has embarked on a regional rampage, attacking Arab and Muslim states with...
Tax amendments
Updated 20 Dec, 2024

Tax amendments

Bureaucracy gimmicks have not produced results, will not do so in the future.
Cricket breakthrough
20 Dec, 2024

Cricket breakthrough

IT had been made clear to Pakistan that a Champions Trophy without India was not even a distant possibility, even if...
Troubled waters
20 Dec, 2024

Troubled waters

LURCHING from one crisis to the next, the Pakistani state has been consistent in failing its vulnerable citizens....