Stockholm outrage

Published January 24, 2023

IT is difficult to accept the free speech argument being used to ‘defend’ frequent acts of desecration by extremists targeting symbols held dear by over a billion Muslims the world over. The fact is that these offensive acts are committed by those with a visceral hatred for Islam and Muslims, and often this animus manifests itself in the shape of grotesque violence. There can be nothing but condemnation of the burning of the Holy Quran in the Swedish capital Stockholm over the weekend by a far-right politician. It goes without saying that a serious discussion in the EU and the West in general is necessary to prevent such outrages from happening again and again. The culprit committed the act in front of the Turkish embassy, and has indulged in similarly hateful behaviour earlier as well. The desecration has been widely condemned by the OIC and individual Muslim states, including Pakistan, while the Swedish PM has criticised the crime as “deeply disrespectful”.

While freedom of expression and belief may be fundamental rights, when religious symbols are attacked by Islamophobes, it sends the signal that violence against Muslims is acceptable. After all, the terrorists who were involved in the mass murder of Muslims in New Zealand and Norway, for example, were from the same ideological gene pool as the character involved in the Stockholm incident. Apart from deeply hurting Muslims and promoting a culture of Islamophobic violence, such acts also embolden extremists within the Islamic world and harm efforts to bring civilisations and cultures together. Instead of issuing mere condemnations, Western states need to consider taking action against those who indulge in inflammatory acts targeting Islam’s sacred symbols. Just as Holocaust denial has been outlawed in many states, desecrating the Quran or the Holy Prophet (PBUH) should also be penalised. Just as Holocaust denial is not covered by free speech laws, attacks on sacred symbols of all faiths must similarly be prohibited.

Published in Dawn, January 24th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Trump 2.0
Updated 07 Nov, 2024

Trump 2.0

It remains to be seen how his promises to bring ‘peace’ to Middle East reconcile with his blatantly pro-Israel bias.
Fait accompli
07 Nov, 2024

Fait accompli

A SLEW of secretively conceived and hastily enacted legislation has achieved its intended result: the powers of the...
IPP contracts
07 Nov, 2024

IPP contracts

THE government expects the ongoing ‘negotiations’ with power producers aimed at revising the terms of sovereign...
Rushed legislation
Updated 06 Nov, 2024

Rushed legislation

For all its stress on "supremacy of parliament", the ruling coalition has wasted no opportunity to reiterate where its allegiances truly lie.
Jail reform policy
06 Nov, 2024

Jail reform policy

THE state is making a fresh attempt to improve conditions in Pakistan’s penitentiaries by developing a national...
BISP overhaul
06 Nov, 2024

BISP overhaul

IT has emerged that the spouses of over 28,500 Sindh government employees have been illicitly benefiting from BISP....