KARACHI: Alam Sher, younger brother of Naqeebullah Mehsud, on Monday challenged the acquittal of former Malir SSP Rao Anwar and his subordinates before the Sindh High Court.

The Sindh government is, however, still undecided whether to challenge the verdict of an antiterrorism court against the recalcitrant police officer in the extrajudicial killing of Naqeeb and three others in a staged encounter.

On Jan 23, an ATC exonerated the then SSP and 17 members of his team by extending them the benefit of the doubt.

Rao Anwar along with his around two-dozen subordinates was tried for allegedly killing Naseemullah, better known as Naqeebullah Mehsud, and three others in an alleged staged encounter in January 2018.

Appellant Alam Sher, through his counsel Jibran Nasir, submitted in the appeal against the ATC verdict that besides factual oversight and misreading of evidence there were legal incurable defects in the judgement.

Referring to a ruling of the Supreme Court, he stated that the trial court had erred in law by passing a consolidated judgement in three cases, as besides the main case the accused police officers were also booked in two other cases for foisting explosives and illicit weapons upon the victims.

While government is still undecided, Naqeeb’s brother files appeal against ATC verdict

Such amalgamation was made by the ATC even though the cases arose out of different FIRs and contained different sets of accused and prosecution witnesses, he maintained.

Advocate Nasir argued that in view of such jurisprudence, it was a settled law that the provisions of Section 21-M of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 did not authorise a court to amalgamate and jointly try separate cases arising out of different FIRs.

He contended that the trial court had failed to adjudicate the charges against the accused under Sections 201, 202 and 204 of the Pakistan Penal Code and such failure to specifically either convict or acquit an accused of every charge was an incurable defect.

The counsel was of the view that the ATC had also erred in discarding crucial evidence in the shape of the call data record (CDR) solely for the reason that no witness from the cellular company concerned had been produced and examined by the prosecution in support of the same and argued it was a settled law that non-production of a material witness could not be made a reason to disbelieve the prosecution story.

He maintained that the complainant side had expressly agitated such contention before the trial court for corroborating CDR and geo-fencing records through summoning and examining expert witnesses, but ATC had refused to call such witness and thus prosecution cannot be held liable for such lack of corroborative testimony.

The lawyer also stated that the charge of abduction was also discharged against the accused on the ground that no independent witness from the place of abduction was made a witness.

He added that the trial court might perform its duty under Section 540 of the CrPC to summon and examine any individual who in the court’s opinion may be necessary for ascertaining the truth.

Disregarding direct evidence of abduction and captivity as deposed by two key witnesses, the trial court concluded that such witnesses in their deposition had made multiple “dishonest improvements”, he maintained.

The counsel further contended that as per the trial court judgement, the delay in the registration of FIR and recording of statements of witnesses was fatal to the case, but it had failed to appreciate the peculiar circumstances involved in the case as pre-trial litigation involved right up to the apex court, formation of joint investigation teams and high-handedness of police as it was the police who had registered false cases against victims bearing a concocted narrative regarding subject incident before lodging of the present FIR.

He alleged that the accused persons had such influence and power that they effortlessly were able to abuse their authority to frame four innocent men as terrorists and showed their cold-blooded murder as a bona fide encounter and five fake FIRs, which were proved false, before the court.

The appellant pleaded to set aside the impugned judgement and convict the accused persons by awarding them the maximum sentence as prescribed under law.

Published in Dawn, February 21st, 2023

Opinion

Accessing the RSF

Accessing the RSF

RSF can help catalyse private sector inves­tment encouraging investment flows, build upon institutional partnerships with MDBs, other financial institutions.

Editorial

Madressah oversight
Updated 19 Dec, 2024

Madressah oversight

Bill should be reconsidered and Directorate General of Religious Education, formed to oversee seminaries, should not be rolled back.
Kurram’s misery
Updated 19 Dec, 2024

Kurram’s misery

The state must recognise that allowing such hardship to continue undermines its basic duty to protect citizens’ well-being.
Hiking gas rates
19 Dec, 2024

Hiking gas rates

IMPLEMENTATION of a new Ogra recommendation to increase the gas prices by an average 8.7pc or Rs142.45 per mmBtu in...
Geopolitical games
Updated 18 Dec, 2024

Geopolitical games

While Assad may be gone — and not many are mourning the end of his brutal rule — Syria’s future does not look promising.
Polio’s toll
18 Dec, 2024

Polio’s toll

MONDAY’s attacks on polio workers in Karak and Bannu that martyred Constable Irfanullah and wounded two ...
Development expenditure
18 Dec, 2024

Development expenditure

PAKISTAN’S infrastructure development woes are wide and deep. The country must annually spend at least 10pc of its...