LAHORE: PML-N chief organiser Maryam Nawaz Sharif has called into question the Supreme Court’s March 1 verdict on the Pun­jab and Khyber Pakht­unkhwa elections, asking why the “4-3 verdict” in the government’s favour was changed to 3-2 against it.

“Before deciding on the elections (in Punjab and KP), this will have to be decided why the verdict of 4-3 judges was changed to 3-2,” she tweeted on Tuesday.

“Without covering the most important point, will any decision be acceptable by forcefully sweeping the decision against the law under the carpet? No way!”

The Supreme Court ruled in the split verdict that elections in Punjab and KP assemblies should be held within 90 days, but it allowed the “barest minimum” delay from the deadline.

The five-member bench — comprising Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Muha­mmad Ali Mazhar, Just­ice Munib Akhtar, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Jamal Mando­khail — gave the verdict by a 3-2 majority, which the PML-N-led ruling coalition had rejected.

Published in Dawn, March 29th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

When medicine fails
Updated 18 Nov, 2024

When medicine fails

Between now and 2050, medical experts expect antibiotic resistance to kill 40m people worldwide.
Nawaz on India
Updated 18 Nov, 2024

Nawaz on India

Nawaz Sharif’s hopes of better ties with India can only be realised when New Delhi responds to Pakistan positively.
State of abuse
18 Nov, 2024

State of abuse

DESPITE censure from the rulers and society, and measures such as helplines and edicts to protect the young from all...
Football elections
17 Nov, 2024

Football elections

PAKISTAN football enters the most crucial juncture of its ‘normalisation’ era next week, when an Extraordinary...
IMF’s concern
17 Nov, 2024

IMF’s concern

ON Friday, the IMF team wrapped up its weeklong unscheduled talks on the Fund’s ongoing $7bn programme with the...
‘Un-Islamic’ VPNs
Updated 17 Nov, 2024

‘Un-Islamic’ VPNs

If curbing pornography is really the country’s foremost concern while it stumbles from one crisis to the next, there must be better ways to do so.