AJK PM disqualified

Published April 13, 2023

AS tensions continue to simmer in Islamabad, on Tuesday, some 100 km away from the federal capital, another clash of institutions saw a prime minister sent packing by the courts over a transgression that, from the face of it, perhaps ought to have been treated with a little more leniency. The High Court of Azad Jammu and Kashmir’s surprise decision to punish PTI’s Sardar Tanveer Ilyas over ‘contemptuous’ remarks against the AJK judiciary have caused quite a bit of a stir, perhaps due to expectations in some quarters for similar rulings to be issued by the top court in Islamabad. Mr Ilyas was deemed by the court to be unfit to remain a member of the AJK Legislative Assembly or to hold public office for two years and was consequently removed from office as prime minister of the territory. While the court said it had issued a “lenient” sentence — Mr Ilyas was punished till the rising of the court, much like Yousuf Raza Gilani was in 2012 — it nonetheless seemed excessive considering the gravity of Mr Ilyas’s ‘crime’.

The now-former AJK premier had been hauled up for indirectly criticising the judiciary for interfering in the workings of his government and tying his hands through the issuance of various injunctions. Though Mr Ilyas quite readily admitted before the court that his remarks may have crossed a line and, on the court’s instructions, even tendered a written acknowledgement of the mistake and apologised for it, the six judges hearing the matter were unanimous in their decision to send him home. The judges’ dim view of contempt stands in stark contrast to the tolerance generally shown by Pakistan’s superior judiciary, which has largely chosen to ignore provocations from various political leaders and taken a more magnanimous view by writing them off as politics. Contempt proceedings, especially against public representatives, are a sensitive matter given the delicate equilibrium of power between the branches of the state. We hope the AJK Supreme Court takes this into consideration when it takes up Mr Ilyas’ re-filed appeal.

Published in Dawn, April 13th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Geopolitical games
Updated 18 Dec, 2024

Geopolitical games

While Assad may be gone — and not many are mourning the end of his brutal rule — Syria’s future does not look promising.
Polio’s toll
18 Dec, 2024

Polio’s toll

MONDAY’s attacks on polio workers in Karak and Bannu that martyred Constable Irfanullah and wounded two ...
Development expenditure
18 Dec, 2024

Development expenditure

PAKISTAN’S infrastructure development woes are wide and deep. The country must annually spend at least 10pc of its...
Risky slope
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Risky slope

Inflation likely to see an upward trajectory once high base effect tapers off.
Digital ID bill
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Digital ID bill

Without privacy safeguards, a centralised digital ID system could be misused for surveillance.
Dangerous revisionism
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Dangerous revisionism

When hatemongers call for digging up every mosque to see what lies beneath, there is a darker agenda driving matters.