A serious business

Published April 27, 2023
The writer is an author.
The writer is an author.

EXTENDED Eid holidays bring everything to halt, except one’s digestion. It is a time to eat, pray and watch long films one would not otherwise find the time to see.

Two recent films caught one’s attention during this period of forced indolence. Both had anti-war themes. One – All Quiet on the Western Front — was set during World War I and the second — War Machine — in the US misadventure in Afghanistan. Both reinforce with compelling evidence George Clemenceau’s famous dictum that war was too serious a business to be left to generals.

Most of us know of All Quiet on the Western Front as a novel by Enrich Maria Remarque. Published in 1928, it was made into a film two years later. It won an Oscar in 1930. It was soon banned by Hitler’s Nazi Party and other countries. Curiously, the ban remained in France until 1963.

Portly German and French generals are depicted gorging on delicacies while their troops are scavenging for sustenance in the trenches. The crescendo occurs during the hour preceding the 11am Armistice on Nov 11, 1918. A German general taking advantage of the pause in hostilities releases a contingent of raw recruits in a suicide mission against the unsuspecting French. It was an act of wanton cruelty bordering on barbarism.

The public is tired of being promised polls that are palpably stale.

History being the version of the victors, Edward Berger’s film is an important corrective to their nationalist lies. That it should have been nominated for an Oscar in 2023 shows how far the pendulum has swung back since 1930 from militarism towards the other extreme — pacifism.

The second film — War Machine (2017) — shows how even Hollywood is not shy to debunk its own heroes. Once it idolised heroes like the clean-cut much decorated Audie Murphy and the ramrod general George Patton (whom Hitler called “that crazy cowboy general”). Today, the anti-hero is in vogue.

In this film, an unforgiving satire, David Michôd uses as his military archetype US Gen Stanley McChrystal, once head of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan. McChrystal was relieved of his command for airing criticism against the Obama administration.

Michôd’s film is a fictionalised account of a four-star general, Glen McMahon (played with comic flair by Brad Pitt), who is transferred from success in Iraq to failure in Afghanistan, where he is determined to give Afghans freedom and democracy. The film contains a brilliant cameo by Ben Kingsley as a cowardly whining president Hamid Karzai.

Subtitles to Michôd’s film could have been Gen Dwight Eisenhower’s dictum: “We are going to have peace even if we have to fight for it.” Or alternatively, Gen George Patton’s assertion that “the object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his”.

It is perhaps too early for our filmmakers to expose our establishments to such candid scrutiny.

India is still recovering from the recent revelations by Satya Pal Malik’s (former governor of Indian-occupied Jammu & Kashmir) during an interview with Karan Thapar. He admitted that PM Modi and NSA A. Doval had told him to keep quiet on the deaths of 40 Indian jawans at Pulwama “due to sheer incompetence” by the Indian top brass, so that blame could be shifted to Pakistan, to help the BJP in elections.

In Pakistan, the PTI chief and his mentor the former COAS Gen Qamar Bajwa are going through a messy divorce. The pre-nup agreement had been quite specific. An extension for Gen Bajwa for three years and then another three until 2023 (and if necessary beyond), while in return, continued support for Imran Khan as prime minister until 2023, and beyond. They spar now thro­ugh the media.

The date of the armistice between Imran Khan’s PTI and the PDM’s combined forces should have been sometime in May, when elections were to be held in Punjab and KP. The date and month remains elusive and unresolved. Meanwhile, the parties continue to snipe at each other from their entrenched positions.

Some stalwarts within the PTI have questioned their leader’s decision not to award provincial assembly tickets to loyalists Fawad Chaudhry and Shah Mahmood Qureshi. Both aspire to become chief minister Punjab. Imran has countered by saying that he wishes to have them in Islamabad. As Sun Tzu said: “Keep your friends close; keep your enemies closer.”

In truth, the Pakistani public is tired of being promised elections that are palpably stale even before they have left the oven. Is there any merit, they ask, in holding elections only to see the same parties continue their combat in the assemblies?

If, according to Herodotus, in peace sons bury their fathers, and in war, fathers bury their sons, Pakistani politicians today strive to bury each other — alive. 

The writer is an author.

www.fsaijazuddin.pk

Published in Dawn, April 27th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Dark turn
Updated 11 Sep, 2024

Dark turn

What transpired in Islamabad should give at least the old guard within the more established political parties some pause.
Clearing the air
11 Sep, 2024

Clearing the air

THE rumour mill had been working overtime regarding a purported extension for the chief justice of the country....
Deplorable remarks
11 Sep, 2024

Deplorable remarks

It is a matter of grave concern that Imran Khan reportedly defended Gandapur’s hideous remarks about the Punjab CM and female journalists.
Delayed bailout
Updated 10 Sep, 2024

Delayed bailout

Dar’s tirade against IMF will likely add to existing uncertainties around the early disbursement of fresh funds.
PTI protest
10 Sep, 2024

PTI protest

IT seems that despite the federal government’s best efforts to sabotage the event, the PTI managed to pull off a...
Superbug threat
Updated 10 Sep, 2024

Superbug threat

THE global superbug crisis — the rise of bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics — is a ticking time bomb. A...