ISLAMABAD: While the Islamabad High Court (IHC) chief justice dissolved a three-member bench hearing the Tyrian White case before reconstituting it, opinions of two judges were uploaded on official website of the court on Wednesday in a move that the registrar office termed against rules when neither a judgement had been pronounced nor cause list issued for its announcement.

Shortly after removal of the 31-page opinion from the website as soon as news of a court ‘order’ in the case pertaining to the alleged daughter of PTI chairman Imran Khan flashed on TV screens, the IHC registrar office issued a clarification.

“Without the announcement of judgement or issuance of cause list for announcement or otherwise intimation to parties and their counsel and without the sign of third member (honourable chief justice), the opinion of two judges was uploaded alone with office notes, which does not constitute judgement of the court and is against the rules and the norms,” the registrar office explained.

The statement announced, “The honourable chief justice has reconstituted the bench for rehearing of the case”, adding that “action is also being taken against those responsible for uploading the opinion without issuance of cause list”.

Opinions of two judges uploaded on court website in violation of rules, says registrar

Even court reporters were unaware of the sudden upload of the ‘decision’ of the two judges until Ahmed Pansota, the counsel for Mr Khan in the Tyrian White case, tweeted the case had been dismissed by a majority of 2 to 1. The reporters, who were present at the IHC, received frantic calls from newsrooms to ascertain the veracity of the development.

It emerged later that the ‘incomplete order’ had been uploaded on the IHC website and a few reporters also managed to download the 31-page ‘decision’ of Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani and Justice Arbab Mohammad Tahir.

Sources privy to the development said the opinions were posted on website as soon as the chief justice had ordered reconstitution of the bench, after recusing himself from hearing the case.

In his nomination papers and affidavits filed for elections, Mr Khan did not disclose that he had arranged for his alleged daughter Tyrian White’s upkeep in the UK, according to the petition moved by one Sajid Mehmood.

In a separate note released for the registrar, Justice Kayani explained the “judgement has been authored and finalised which was transmitted to Hon’ble Chief Justice, even a note in this regard has been sent on May 2, 2023 to my lord the Hon’ble Chief Justice with request to list the case for announcement on May 3, 2023, despite whereof, case has not yet been listed till date [May 09].”

In his opinion, the judge also stated, “Therefore any further delay in release of the judgement singed by two members of the bench who constitute a majority, could cause aspersion on the outcome of the case and impugn the confidentiality and integrity of the court process and public from the independence of the court.”

Published in Dawn, May 11th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Geopolitical games
Updated 18 Dec, 2024

Geopolitical games

While Assad may be gone — and not many are mourning the end of his brutal rule — Syria’s future does not look promising.
Polio’s toll
18 Dec, 2024

Polio’s toll

MONDAY’s attacks on polio workers in Karak and Bannu that martyred Constable Irfanullah and wounded two ...
Development expenditure
18 Dec, 2024

Development expenditure

PAKISTAN’S infrastructure development woes are wide and deep. The country must annually spend at least 10pc of its...
Risky slope
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Risky slope

Inflation likely to see an upward trajectory once high base effect tapers off.
Digital ID bill
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Digital ID bill

Without privacy safeguards, a centralised digital ID system could be misused for surveillance.
Dangerous revisionism
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Dangerous revisionism

When hatemongers call for digging up every mosque to see what lies beneath, there is a darker agenda driving matters.