LAHORE: The Lahore High Court was told on Tuesday that a joint venture agreement signed between the governor of Punjab through member colonies of Board of Revenue and the Pakistan Army through director general strategic projects of the General Head­quarters for the corporate agriculture farming was not sustainable in the law.

“The JV should have been signed by the president [Arif Alvi] on behalf of the army,” Advocate Fahad Malik said in his concluding arguments on behalf of a public interest petition challenging the handing over 45,267 acres on lease to the army for corporate farming.

The counsel, however, reiterated that the army was not authorised or empowered to undertake any commercial or other activities beyond its composition. He said that the army had no jurisdiction to directly or indirectly engage in business ventures of any nature outside its composition nor to claim any state land for corporate agriculture farming.

He argued that the government had given an impression as if only barren or waste land had been leased out but the JV document showed that cultivated land had also been handed over to the army under the garb of corporate farming.

Pointing out more anomalies in the JV agreement, Advocate Malik said the lessor (the government) had been burdened with an undue responsibility to provide the lessee (the army) canal water or electricity, construct farm to market roads or tracks.

Summing up his arguments, the counsel said the impugned notification of the land lease was illegal as the caretaker government of the province was not vested with any power to sanction it. He said the scope of the caretaker government was limited to perform day-to-day functions of the province and specifically barred it from taking policy decisions of permanent nature.

Justice Abid Hussain Chattha would resume further hearing on Wednesday (today).

The other day, record placed before the court showed that a ministerial committee that met last year to modify the terms and conditions for corporate farming under the CPEC had not recorded its formal minutes.

As the caretaker government agreed this year to hand over the land to the army in three districts Bhakkar, Khushab and Sahiwal on a 20-year lease (with the possibility to extend it for another 10 years), Public Interest Law Association of Pakistan (Pilap), a non-profit organisation filed a petition with the LHC.

Pilap questioned the caretaker government’s power to take the decision, which it said was also in violation of the Doctrine of Public Trust that states the government is responsible for protecting certain natural resources and cannot give them away to private citizens arbitrarily.

Published in Dawn, May 31st, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Military option
Updated 21 Nov, 2024

Military option

While restoring peace is essential, addressing Balochistan’s socioeconomic deprivation is equally important.
HIV/AIDS disaster
21 Nov, 2024

HIV/AIDS disaster

A TORTUROUS sense of déjà vu is attached to the latest health fiasco at Multan’s Nishtar Hospital. The largest...
Dubious pardon
21 Nov, 2024

Dubious pardon

IT is disturbing how a crime as grave as custodial death has culminated in an out-of-court ‘settlement’. The...
Islamabad protest
Updated 20 Nov, 2024

Islamabad protest

As Nov 24 draws nearer, both the PTI and the Islamabad administration must remain wary and keep within the limits of reason and the law.
PIA uncertainty
20 Nov, 2024

PIA uncertainty

THE failed attempt to privatise the national flag carrier late last month has led to a fierce debate around the...
T20 disappointment
20 Nov, 2024

T20 disappointment

AFTER experiencing the historic high of the One-day International series triumph against Australia, Pakistan came...