Beyond mandate

Published June 24, 2023

IT is another significant milestone in the annals of litigation involving land — specifically, the wholesale handing over of state land to influential quarters through shady means, demonstrating utter disregard for the rule of law. The Lahore High Court on Wednesday struck down a decision by Punjab’s caretaker government to give 45,267 acres of land in the province to the army on a 20-year lease. The transfer would have been the first ‘instalment’ of the one million acres the army wanted to acquire in the province for corporate agriculture farming. The plan had been conceived under the PTI government in 2021 to address the challenge of food security, and the Punjab cabinet at the time had conditionally approved a Statement of Conditions. However, the notification transferring the 45,000-plus acres was issued not by the elected provincial cabinet but by the caretaker dispensation last year. Not only that, the earlier agreed upon SOC was substantially revised, expanding the scope of activities and making the process non-transparent, thereby giving undue advantage to one party in the agreement. The verdict rightly denounces the caretaker set-up for having acted with “undue haste and [in] abhorrent … fashion” to approve the transaction.

The judgement stresses the question of mandate, and trenchantly notes that both the caretaker government and the army had exceeded theirs. It asserts that the army’s primary responsibility is to defend Pakistan and protect its people “without being involved in any kind of political, social or economic divide which may erode its professional capability, neutrality, prestige and pride”. A number of recent judgements by the superior courts have prohibited the security forces from engaging in commercial activity on land allotted to them for defence-related purposes, or even otherwise. In January 2019, the Supreme Court banned all commercial activities on military lands in Karachi, with a two-judge bench asking why the armed forces were running wedding halls and cinemas. Last year, the Islamabad High Court ordered that the Pakistan Navy’s sailing club and farmhouses be demolished, deeming them to have been illegally constructed on national park land. Unfortunately, these landmark verdicts have not been heeded. None of these ventures would have been possible without the collaboration of governing authorities. Neither side seems to have any interest in the equitable distribution of resources, nor any respect for its duty to the people.

Published in Dawn, June 24th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Tax amendments
Updated 20 Dec, 2024

Tax amendments

Bureaucracy gimmicks have not produced results, will not do so in the future.
Cricket breakthrough
20 Dec, 2024

Cricket breakthrough

IT had been made clear to Pakistan that a Champions Trophy without India was not even a distant possibility, even if...
Troubled waters
20 Dec, 2024

Troubled waters

LURCHING from one crisis to the next, the Pakistani state has been consistent in failing its vulnerable citizens....
Madressah oversight
Updated 19 Dec, 2024

Madressah oversight

Bill should be reconsidered and Directorate General of Religious Education, formed to oversee seminaries, should not be rolled back.
Kurram’s misery
Updated 19 Dec, 2024

Kurram’s misery

The state must recognise that allowing such hardship to continue undermines its basic duty to protect citizens’ well-being.
Hiking gas rates
19 Dec, 2024

Hiking gas rates

IMPLEMENTATION of a new Ogra recommendation to increase the gas prices by an average 8.7pc or Rs142.45 per mmBtu in...