ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court decided on Thursday not to initiate contempt proceedings against an advocate who had hurled accusations against judges and raised objections about composition of the bench hearing PTI Chairman Imran Khan’s plea to quash an FIR over the murder of a lawyer in Quetta.

“After deliberations, the unconditional apology rendered by the learned counsel for the complainant was accepted,” said a two-page order issued by a three-judge Supreme Court bench. The bench consisted of Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi and Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi.

The proceedings turned unpleasant on Wednesday when Aman­ullah Kanrani, the advocate for Siraj Shar, the son of Abdul Razzaq Shar, objected to the presence of two judges on the three-member bench. Although Mr Kanrani refused to tender a written apology, he expressed verbal regrets, with folded hands, for his behaviour. He, however, said the court should not “become a party. It should decide the matter on merit”.

The two judges are Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi and Syed Hassan Azhar Rizvi.

On Wednesday, Justice Yahya Afridi had observed that the court would issue a written order in this regard.

The order, which was released on Thursday, stated that the counsel for the complainant (Siraj Shar) was asked to address the court regarding the allegations made in the FIR.

Instead of focusing on the issue at hand, the order added, the counsel raised objections regarding composition of the bench.

When the bench asked Amanullah Kanrani to give specific examples, he withdrew the allegation and submitted an apology, the court order said.

After deliberations, the “unconditional apology” tendered by Mr Kanrani was accepted, the order said.

The apex court adjourned the hearing to Aug 24. It made it clear that a previous order not to arrest former prime minister Imran Khan during the investigations would remain in force.

The order further said that since no substantial arguments had been heard on the merits of the petition and since the present bench may not be available on the next date of hearing due to summer vacations, this petition will not be treated as a part-heard case and may be fixed for hearing before any bench available on the date fixed.

Published in Dawn, August 11th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Islamabad march
Updated 27 Nov, 2024

Islamabad march

WITH emotions running high, chaos closes in. As these words were being written, rumours and speculation were all...
Policing the internet
27 Nov, 2024

Policing the internet

IT is chilling to witness how Pakistan — a nation that embraced the freedoms of modern democracy, and the tech ...
Correcting sports priorities
27 Nov, 2024

Correcting sports priorities

IT has been a lingering battle that has cast a shadow over sports in Pakistan: who are the national sports...
Kurram ceasefire
Updated 26 Nov, 2024

Kurram ceasefire

DESPITE efforts by the KP government to bring about a ceasefire in Kurram tribal district, the bloodletting has...
Hollow victory
26 Nov, 2024

Hollow victory

THE conclusion of COP29 in Baku has left developing nations — struggling with the mounting costs of climate...
Infrastructure schemes
26 Nov, 2024

Infrastructure schemes

THE government’s decision to finance priority PSDP schemes on a three-year rolling basis is a significant step...