Struck down

Published August 12, 2023

JUST a day after the 15th National Assembly was dissolved, the Supreme Court reversed one of its key legislative interventions in the judicial domain by striking down the Supreme Court (Review of Judgements and Orders) Act of 2023.

A three-member bench of the apex court unanimously held the law “repugnant and ultra vires to the Constitution”, ruling that converting the apex court’s review jurisdiction into an appellate jurisdiction required a constitutional amendment.

It may be recalled that the law in question would have allowed affected parties to appeal any judgement or order, passed by the Supreme Court in exercise of its original jurisdiction under Article 184(3), before a larger bench.

The facility had been extended retrospectively, with critics saying this had been done to give Nawaz Sharif and Jahangir Tareen an opportunity to have their sentences overturned.

It may be recalled that the PDM government had passed several laws affecting the superior judiciary amidst a stand-off triggered by a petition challenging unconstitutional delays in elections to the KP and Punjab assemblies.

The enactment of the Review of Judgements and Orders Act, in particular, had taken the apex court by surprise, forcing it to indefinitely adjourn proceedings on a review petition filed by the ECP against an earlier ruling on election timelines.

Referencing the circumstances in which the law was passed, the Supreme Court ruled that ordinary legislation that interferes with the independence of the judiciary is “unconstitutional, null, void and of no legal effect” from its inception.

As regards the impact of this judgement on Nawaz Sharif’s disqualification status, the outgoing law minister has said it does not matter as the amended Elections Act now limits the length of disqualification of lawmakers to five years with retrospective effect.

However, it would appear that the ECP may face new difficulties as it defends its decision to disregard constitutional timelines for elections that have become due.

Exactly a week earlier, the apex court issued a detailed judgement elaborating on its April 4 short order on the ECP’s decision to postpone polls, in which it excoriated the election watchdog for taking an unconstitutional step despite a Supreme Court order directing that elections in Punjab be held latest by May 14.

With no means of appealing that judgement now at its disposal, it will be interesting to see how the ECP responds.

Published in Dawn, August 12th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Kurram atrocity
Updated 22 Nov, 2024

Kurram atrocity

It would be a monumental mistake for the state to continue ignoring the violence in Kurram.
Persistent grip
22 Nov, 2024

Persistent grip

PAKISTAN has now registered 50 polio cases this year. We all saw it coming and yet there was nothing we could do to...
Green transport
22 Nov, 2024

Green transport

THE government has taken a commendable step by announcing a New Energy Vehicle policy aiming to ensure that by 2030,...
Military option
Updated 21 Nov, 2024

Military option

While restoring peace is essential, addressing Balochistan’s socioeconomic deprivation is equally important.
HIV/AIDS disaster
21 Nov, 2024

HIV/AIDS disaster

A TORTUROUS sense of déjà vu is attached to the latest health fiasco at Multan’s Nishtar Hospital. The largest...
Dubious pardon
21 Nov, 2024

Dubious pardon

IT is disturbing how a crime as grave as custodial death has culminated in an out-of-court ‘settlement’. The...