Torkham closure

Published September 13, 2023

THE weeklong closure of the Torkham crossing between Pakistan and Afghanistan has had a detrimental effect on bilateral relations, with trade ties particularly affected, while causing considerable human misery to those wishing to cross the border. Trouble started on Sept 6 when both sides traded fire.

According to authorities here, the Afghans had started building an “unlawful structure” on Pakistani territory, while Afghan troops resorted to “indiscriminate firing” when they were confronted over the disputed construction.

Meetings between officials from both sides have failed to resolve the dispute, with the result that hundreds of vehicles remain stranded, waiting to go across the border, while people wishing to get to the other side have also been left high and dry.

The cost of the closure has reportedly resulted in losses worth hundreds of millions of rupees, with perishable items — including fruit and vegetables from Afghanistan — not getting to market and rotting in the hot weather.

Comments made by the Taliban-led regime in Kabul taking a swipe at Pakistan’s economic troubles have certainly not helped cool tempers, as the Afghan side referred to Pakistan “being heavily dependent … on exports in the current situation”. The Foreign Office has been critical of the Taliban’s ‘unsolicited advice’.

Friction has occurred at the Torkham border in the past as well; the fact is that territorial disputes between Pakistan and Afghanistan date back to the time of this country’s independence.

However, the Afghan Taliban need to be mindful of Pakistan’s sensitivities, and refrain from construction activities on disputed territory. Higher-level exchanges are required to properly demarcate disputed border regions, so that these irritants are permanently addressed.

Moreover, traders and the general public on both sides are suffering from the extended border closure, which is why officials from Islamabad and Kabul need to reopen the crossing as soon as possible.

Torkham is a key conduit in Afghan transit trade, but Pakistan’s security concerns, as well as respect for this country’s territorial sovereignty, must be addressed by Kabul’s rulers to ensure cross-border economic activities continue smoothly.

Meanwhile, Pakistan’s desire to establish strong trade and energy linkages with Central Asia cannot be fulfilled unless there is a cordial relationship with and security guarantees from Kabul. Trade through official channels is a mutually beneficial proposition, but only if there is conflict-free border management.

Published in Dawn, September 13th, 2023

Opinion

From hard to harder

From hard to harder

Instead of ‘hard state’ turning even harder, citizens deserve a state that goes soft on them in delivering democratic and development aspirations.

Editorial

Canal unrest
Updated 03 Apr, 2025

Canal unrest

With rising water scarcity in Indus system, it is crucial to move towards a consensus-driven policymaking process.
Iran-US tension
03 Apr, 2025

Iran-US tension

THE Trump administration’s threats aimed at Iran do not bode well for global peace, and unless Washington changes...
Flights to history
03 Apr, 2025

Flights to history

MOHENJODARO could have been the forgotten gold we desperately need. Instead, this 5,000-year-old well of antiquity ...
Eid amidst crises
Updated 31 Mar, 2025

Eid amidst crises

Until the Muslim world takes practical steps to end these atrocities, these besieged populations will see no joy.
Women’s rights
Updated 01 Apr, 2025

Women’s rights

Such judgements, and others directly impacting women’s rights should be given more airtime in media.
Not helping
Updated 02 Apr, 2025

Not helping

If it's committed to peace in Balochistan, the state must draw a line between militancy and legitimate protest.