IF only we, as a nation, had adopted Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah’s legacy, the country would not have been where it happens to be currently. We would never have suffered the humiliation of surrender in 1971, nor would we have ventured and got involved in proxy wars and become hostage to extremism and terrorism. The economy would not have been in tatters.

Jinnah wanted a modern democratic welfare state, where the Muslims could live in peace and harmony with members of other faiths or creeds, all enjoying equal rights as citizens of a sovereign state.

In Jinnah’s Pakistan there was no space for dictatorship, nor any concept of extremism, nor any role for the clergy, or paid public office holders, to decide the affairs of the state. What happened in Jaranwala recently could never have occurred if we had adopted his vision of a vibrant modern democratic welfare state, which would have invested in human resource development, with no tolerance for extremism. The kind of extremists who were involved in Jaranwala vandalism would never have existed in the first instance, and, if they did, the state would have dealt with them with an iron hand. We must never forget that Jinnah’s choice of Pakistan’s first law minister was Jogendra Nath Mandal, a Hindu Dalit leader.

Jinnah’s Pakistan would never have forfeited state sovereignty by giving the Badaber airbase from where American reconnaissance flights were to fly over Soviet airspace, nor would this country have got involved in superpower rivalry duringthe Cold War days. Pakistan would not have got involved in Afghan proxy wars and given sanctuary to foreign militants and mercenaries. In Jinnah’s Pakistan there would have been no dictator, and, hence, no ‘manufactured’ political midget.

Pakistan would have functioned as a modern state, investing in education, health and provision of basic necessities of life to its citizens. People would have been living in peace, free from the scourge of terrorism that it faces today.

On Jan 24, 1945, in an interview to London-based News Chronicle, Jinnah stated that the demand for Pakistan was “not a territorial demand, but a Muslim national demand”, and that the “Hindu society is so caste-ridden

that democracy is completely foreign and opposed to their basic and fundamental principles and structure of their society”.

Modi’s India has proven that Jinnah’s apprehension was based on solid grounds.

Malik Tariq Ali
Lahore

Published in Dawn, September 14th, 2023

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...